BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 2(24)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai146Chandigarh54Chennai40Bangalore40Hyderabad28Delhi27Visakhapatnam20Cuttack19Kolkata16Amritsar8Jaipur6Ahmedabad5Pune4Nagpur3Surat2Cochin2Panaji1Indore1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 115J12Section 36(1)(viia)6Section 194A5Section 201(1)4Deduction4TDS4Section 143(3)3Section 2633Disallowance3Section 36

BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 565/PUN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2019-20 Bajaj Finance Limited Pcit-3, Pune 3Rd Floor, Panchshil Tech Park, Vs. Viman Nagar, Pune – 411014 Pan: Aabcb1518L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Percy Pardiwalla Department By : Shri Amol Khairnar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 06-01-2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-01-2026

For Appellant: Shri Percy PardiwallaFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 41Section 80J

24,170/-. The assessee subsequently revised the return on 30.11.2020 declaring total income of Rs.5301,77,46,430/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS on the following issues: 2 S.No. Issues i. Claim of Any Other Amount Allowable as Deduction in Schedule BP ii Increase in TDS in Revised Return iii. High Creditors/liabilities iv. Reduction of Income

2
Section 372

BANK OF MAHARASHTRA,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -1(1), PUNE

The appeals are dismissed

ITA 472/PUN/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteनिर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Bank Of Maharashtra Vs. Dcit, Circle 1501, Lokmangal, Shivajinagar, 1(1), Pune Pune – 411005 Pan : Aaccb0774B Appellant Respondent निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Dcit, Circle Vs. Bank Of Maharashtra 1(1), Pune 1501, Lokmangal, Shivajinagar, Pune – 411005 Pan : Aaccb0774B Appellant Respondent

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37

viia) disallowance pertaining to bad and doubtful debts as the same is found to be a recurring issue between the parties. This tribunal‟s latest co-ordinate bench order in assessment year 2010-11 appears to have restored the instant issue to the assessing authority as follows: “3.3 Both sides heard. Orders of the authorities below perused. In ground

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 1(1), PUNE vs. M/S. BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, PUNE

The appeals are dismissed

ITA 596/PUN/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteनिर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Bank Of Maharashtra Vs. Dcit, Circle 1501, Lokmangal, Shivajinagar, 1(1), Pune Pune – 411005 Pan : Aaccb0774B Appellant Respondent निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Dcit, Circle Vs. Bank Of Maharashtra 1(1), Pune 1501, Lokmangal, Shivajinagar, Pune – 411005 Pan : Aaccb0774B Appellant Respondent

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)Section 37

viia) disallowance pertaining to bad and doubtful debts as the same is found to be a recurring issue between the parties. This tribunal‟s latest co-ordinate bench order in assessment year 2010-11 appears to have restored the instant issue to the assessing authority as follows: “3.3 Both sides heard. Orders of the authorities below perused. In ground

ABHYUDAYA CO-OP. BANK LTD. vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 52/PUN/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Apr 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.52/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Abhyudaya Co-Op. Bank Ltd., New Panvel Branch, Plot No.16, Sector 17, Cidco Colony, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant New Panvel – 410206 …. Pan:Aaaaa0300L Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Tds), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Panvel

For Appellant: Shri C.H. NaniwadekarFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 194ASection 194A(1)Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS was not deducted on interest paid to Co-operative societies, members and shareholders. The assessee explained that under section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it is provided that provisions of section 194A(1) of the Act will not apply to such income credited or paid by Co-operative society to its members or to any other Co-operative