SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

22. Now taking guidance from the above observations of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court and also going through the provisions of section 200A in totality, we find that so far as sub- section (1) of section 200A of the Act there is no dispute as it provides the mechanism for processing the TDS returns/statements. Sub-section (2

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

22. Now taking guidance from the above observations of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court and also going through the provisions of section 200A in totality, we find that so far as sub- section (1) of section 200A of the Act there is no dispute as it provides the mechanism for processing the TDS returns/statements. Sub-section (2

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

22. Now taking guidance from the above observations of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court and also going through the provisions of section 200A in totality, we find that so far as sub- section (1) of section 200A of the Act there is no dispute as it provides the mechanism for processing the TDS returns/statements. Sub-section (2

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

22. Now taking guidance from the above observations of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court and also going through the provisions of section 200A in totality, we find that so far as sub- section (1) of section 200A of the Act there is no dispute as it provides the mechanism for processing the TDS returns/statements. Sub-section (2

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

22. Now taking guidance from the above observations of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court and also going through the provisions of section 200A in totality, we find that so far as sub- section (1) of section 200A of the Act there is no dispute as it provides the mechanism for processing the TDS returns/statements. Sub-section (2

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

22. Now taking guidance from the above observations of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court and also going through the provisions of section 200A in totality, we find that so far as sub- section (1) of section 200A of the Act there is no dispute as it provides the mechanism for processing the TDS returns/statements. Sub-section (2

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

22).\n1.5 The assessee Appellant, additionally submitted that the distinction\nbetween tax, interest and fees canalso be made out from the fact that the\ncharging section for tax, i.e. section 4 also mentions only income tax, TDS/TCS.\nFor interest and late fees, there are separate charging sections namely\n201(1A), 220(2) and 234E.\nIt has been also submitted

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. AURANGABAD , AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

22).\n1.5 The assessee Appellant, additionally submitted that the distinction\nbetween tax, interest and fees canalso be made out from the fact that the\ncharging section for tax, i.e. section 4 also mentions only income tax, TDS/TCS.\nFor interest and late fees, there are separate charging sections namely\n201(1A), 220(2) and 234E.\nIt has been also submitted

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

22).\n1.5 The assessee Appellant, additionally submitted that the distinction\nbetween tax, interest and fees canalso be made out from the fact that the\ncharging section for tax, i.e. section 4 also mentions only income tax, TDS/TCS.\nFor interest and late fees, there are separate charging sections namely\n201(1A), 220(2) and 234E.\nIt has been also submitted

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. ,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

22).\n1.5 The assessee Appellant, additionally submitted that the distinction\nbetween tax, interest and fees canalso be made out from the fact that the\ncharging section for tax, i.e. section 4 also mentions only income tax, TDS/TCS.\nFor interest and late fees, there are separate charging sections namely\n201(1A), 220(2) and 234E.\n1.6 It has been also submitted

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

22).\n1.5\nThe assessee Appellant, additionally submitted that the distinction\nbetween tax, interest and fees canalso be made out from the fact that the\ncharging section for tax, i.e. section 4 also mentions only income tax, TDS/TCS.\nFor interest and late fees, there are separate charging sections namely\n201(1A), 220(2) and 234E.\nChate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd.and\nShree Bhaskaracharya

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

22).\n1.5 The assessee Appellant, additionally submitted that the distinction\nbetween tax, interest and fees canalso be made out from the fact that the\ncharging section for tax, i.e. section 4 also mentions only income tax, TDS/TCS.\nFor interest and late fees, there are separate charging sections namely\n201(1A), 220(2) and 234E.\n1.6 It has been also submitted

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. ,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

22).\n1.5 The assessee Appellant, additionally submitted that the distinction\nbetween tax, interest and fees canalso be made out from the fact that the\ncharging section for tax, i.e. section 4 also mentions only income tax, TDS/TCS.\nFor interest and late fees, there are separate charging sections namely\n201(1A), 220(2) and 234E.\nIt has been also submitted

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, CPC TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

22).\n1.5 The assessee Appellant, additionally submitted that the distinction\nbetween tax, interest and fees canalso be made out from the fact that the\ncharging section for tax, i.e. section 4 also mentions only income tax, TDS/TCS.\nFor interest and late fees, there are separate charging sections namely\n201(1A), 220(2) and 234E.\n1.6 It has been also submitted

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

22).\n1.5 The assessee Appellant, additionally submitted that the distinction\nbetween tax, interest and fees canalso be made out from the fact that the\ncharging section for tax, i.e. section 4 also mentions only income tax, TDS/TCS.\nFor interest and late fees, there are separate charging sections namely\n201(1A), 220(2) and 234E.\nIt has been also submitted

SHREE GARUDA PLANT PRODUCTS LTD,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1 (2),, NASHIK

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.492/Pun/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Shree Garuda Plant Products The Income Tax Officer, Ltd., Vs Ward-1(2), Nashik. B-26, Additional Midc Area, Ambad, Nashik. Pan: Aaacg 0563 H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Nishint Gandhi – Ar Revenue By Shri M.G.Jasnani – Dr Date Of Hearing 20/07/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 14/10/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Nashik For The Assessment Year 2015-16, Dated 19.02.2019, Emanating Out Of Order Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 26.12.2017. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1.In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) - 1, Nashik ["The Cit (A)" For Short] Erred In Confirming The Order Of The Learned Income Tax Officer - 1 (2), Nashik, ["The Ao" For Short] Which Was Passed In Violation Of Principles Of Natural Justice Without Affording A Proper Opportunity Of Being Heard To The Appellant. 2. In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Ao In Invoking Section 14A R.W.R. 8D Of The Act, Whereby A Disallowance Of Rs.12,81,831/- Was Made In The Hands Of The Appellant.

Section 2(22)(e) are attracted for the loan of Rs.Rs.11,12,387/- from Kimplas Piping System Ltd to the assessee. Therefore, respectfully following the ITAT Mumbai bench decision , we hold that the AO has rightly treated loan of Rs.11,12,387/- received from Kimplas Piping System Ltd as deemed dividend. Accordingly, impugned addition is upheld. Therefore, the Ground

MAHARASHTRA JEEVAN PRADHIKARAN,,PARBHANI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (TDS) RANGE -NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 2410/Pun/2017 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran Works Division, Parbhani-431 401 Tan : Nskm04669A .......अपीलाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

TDS returns under section 272A(2)(k) of the Act. Since section 273B of the Act covers the cases of levy of penalty under section 272A(2) of the Act, then in line with the provisions of said section in case a person establishes its case of reasonable cause for not complying with the provisions of said section, then

DEPUTY COLLECTOR OFFICE,,UDGIR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS RANGE,, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.319/Pun/2019 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : - Deputy Collector Office, The Jcit, Tds, Range, Main Road, Udgir, Tq.Udgir, Vs Nashik. Dist.Latur - 413517. Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe – Dr Date Of Hearing 29/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 04/07/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Aurangabad Arising Out Of Assessing Officer’S Order Section 272A(2)(K) R.W.S 200(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Also Called As ‘The Act’) Dated 26.11.2018. 2. The Only Issue Involved In This Appeal Is Levy Of Penalty U/S.272A(2)(K) Of The Act. The Assessing Officer Vide Order Dated 05/02/2014 Levied Penalty U/S.272A(2)(K) Of The Act For Delay In Filling Quarterly Statements Of Tax Deducted At Source (Tds) U/S.200(3) Of The Act.

section 272A(2)(k) of the Act. We reverse the finding of CIT(A) in this regard. ITA No.319/PUN/2019 for A.Y. 2012-13 Deputy Collector Office Vs. JCIT, TDS, Range, Nashik (A) 22