BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 194A(3)(f)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai207Chandigarh89Delhi84Bangalore73Chennai46Kolkata31Jaipur23Hyderabad20Cuttack19Ahmedabad13Karnataka11Panaji10Amritsar8Dehradun7Cochin6Visakhapatnam5Pune5SC5Telangana4Ranchi3Lucknow2J&K2Indore1Guwahati1Jodhpur1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 4012TDS5Addition to Income5Section 43C4Section 143(3)4Section 2634Disallowance4Section 194A3Section 54E3Section 148

M/S KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD,PUNE vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-7, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 704/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil S PathakFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkende
Section 143(2)Section 40Section 43C

3) and (4) of section 43CA of the Act, no addition is called for since a part of the consideration has been received by cheque on the basis of agreement and the sale deeds were registered on the basis of value mentioned in the agreement. We, therefore, set aside the order of the CIT(A) / NFAC and direct the Assessing

PARVATI STEEL RE ROLLING MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CC-2, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

3
Section 133(6)2
Deduction2

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1741/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreassessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Rajkumar Singh (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai, Addl CIT DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 69A

194A of the Act. Further, TCS statement shows a transaction of Rs.60,01,813/- during the year under consideration. In absence of filing of any return of income and in absence of any explanation regarding the nature and source of the above transactions, the Assessing Officer treated the cash deposited to the extent of Rs.2,23,20,800/- as unexplained

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SATARA CIRCLE ,, SATARA vs. VIKRAM HANMANT GHORPADE,, SATARA

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 102/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 44A

f Income tax (A)-4, Pune, has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.1,68,.33,800/- on account of commission and brokerage paid ignoring the settled position of law that disallowance of commission payment is warranted where genuineness of services rendered is not established (Premier Breweries Ltd V. CIT 56 Taxmann.com 351- Supreme Court; Lachminarayan Mandanlal

MAHAVIR ADINATH SALVE,,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1 (1),, SOLAPUR

Appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 441/PUN/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपीलसं. / Ita No.441/Pun/2019 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 Shri Mahavir Adinath Salve, The Ito, Ward-1(1), Solapur. House No.930, Nagane Plot Vs Paranda Road, Barshi, . Solapur – 413411. Pan: Arxps 5761 N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri V L Jain – Ar Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe – Dr Date Of Hearing 11/08/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 29/08/2022 आदेश/ Order Per S.S.Godara, Jm: This Assessee’S Appeal For Assessment Year 2008-09 Is Directed Against The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-7, Pune’S Order Dated 15.11.2018 Passed In Appeal No.Pn/Cit(A)-7/Cir- 1/0804/2016-17, In Proceedings U/S.143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [In Short “The Act”].

Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 40

194A, 194D, 194DA, 1941, 194K. However, in respect of section 1941 which is applicable to the rent payable on land, building, equipment and machinery has been inserted only by the Finance Act, 2016 w. e. f. 01.06.2016. The appellant’s case relates to AY 2008-09 and therefore, the same is not applicable to the appellant’s case. Therefore, irrespective

PRABHAKAR MANJAJI THAKRE vs. PRINCIPOAL C.I.T.-1, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 230/NAG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm Assessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri M.K. KulkarniFor Respondent: Shri J.P. Chandraker
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 201Section 263Section 40Section 54E

f). The same was not offered for taxation and the A.O also erred in not making a disallowance of the same u/s 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act, 1961. (ii) The assessee has sold plots amounting to Rs. 15,46,000/-. The long term capital gain from this transaction was shown of Rs. 14,68,380/-. However, the same