BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

101 results for “TDS”+ Section 194A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai371Delhi265Bangalore163Chandigarh120Nagpur106Kolkata103Chennai103Pune101Karnataka69Ahmedabad68Hyderabad68Jaipur64Cochin60Visakhapatnam48Cuttack40Raipur22Rajkot16Panaji15Jodhpur14Amritsar14Surat14Indore8Telangana8SC8Jabalpur7Dehradun7Kerala4Ranchi4Allahabad4Lucknow4Guwahati3Patna3Agra3J&K2Varanasi2

Key Topics

Section 40102TDS90Section 201(1)86Section 194A64Section 20159Section 14858Addition to Income57Limitation/Time-bar35Deduction33Section 200

ABHYUDAYA CO-OP. BANK LTD. vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 52/PUN/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Apr 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.52/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Abhyudaya Co-Op. Bank Ltd., New Panvel Branch, Plot No.16, Sector 17, Cidco Colony, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant New Panvel – 410206 …. Pan:Aaaaa0300L Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Tds), …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Panvel

For Appellant: Shri C.H. NaniwadekarFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar, CIT
Section 194ASection 194A(1)Section 194A(3)(i)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 194A(3)(viia)Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS was not deducted on interest paid to Co-operative societies, members and shareholders. The assessee explained that under section 194A(3)(v) of the Act, it is provided that provisions of section 194A(1

Showing 1–20 of 101 · Page 1 of 6

30
Disallowance28
Section 143(3)26

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT vs. MANORAMA COOP BANK LTD, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2157/PUN/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2157/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Acit, Cricle-2, Solapur. Vs. Manorama Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Plot 4, 5, 6 Vijapur Road, Indiranagar S.O., Maharashtra- 413004. Pan : Aajfm6823C Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Ms. Shilpa N. C. Assessee By : Shri Pramod S. Shingte Date Of Hearing : 22.01.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.04.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 15.07.2024 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1) The Ld Cit(A), Nfac Has Erred In Admitting This Exemption U/S 194A (3)(V) To The Assessee For Non-Deduction Of Tds On Interest Credits Of Nominal Members Who Are Not Actual Member As Per Definition Of Person Who Is Eligible For Membership As Per Clause

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Ms. Shilpa N. C
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 40

1) The Ld CIT(A), NFAC has erred in admitting this exemption u/s 194A (3)(v) to the assessee for non-deduction of TDS on interest credits of nominal members who are not actual member as per definition of person who is eligible for membership as per clause 2 no 4(ix) and Rule 9(d) of the By-laws

M/S. NASHIK DISTRICT INDUSTRAIL & MERCANTILE CO-OP. BANK LTD.,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1967/PUN/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1967/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Nashik District Industrial & Mercantile Co-Op. Bank Ltd., 1, Shivkamal Appt., Canada Corner, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Nashik – 422005 …. Pan: Aaaan1531A Vs. The Income Tax Officer, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Ward 1(2), Nashik

For Appellant: Shri Sanket JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Garg
Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 194A(1)Section 194A(3)(v)Section 40

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’). 2. The assessee has raised the following ground of appeal:- On facts and in law, 2 Nashik Dist. Industrial & Mercantile Co-op Bank Ltd. 1] The learned CIT(A) erred in holding that the assessee co-op, bank was liable to deduct TDS u/s 194A

TOKAI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,HINGOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-(1), JALNA, JALNA

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 571/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Jan 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri G.D.Padmahshaliआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.571/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Tokai Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana The Income Tax Officer, Ltd., Vs Ward-1, Jalna. Villag Kurunda, Taluka Basmath . District, Hingoli – 431512. Pan: Aaat6997Q Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Anand Partani – Ar Revenue By Shri M.G.Jasnani – Dr Date Of Hearing 16/01/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16/01/2024

Section 194ASection 250Section 270ASection 37(1)Section 40aSection 43B

TDS u s 194A(1). The provisions of 194A(1) are not applicable on interest paid to banks and therefore the disallowance is bad in law and liable to be deleted. 6. On the basis of facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld CIT(A) has erred in disallowing interest expenses paid on late filing

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. BAJAJ FINANCE LTD., (FORMERLY: BAJAJ AUTO FINANCE LTD.,),, PUNE

In the result, appeal of Revenue and Cross Objections of assessee are dismissed

ITA 356/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.356/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10

For Appellant: Shri Kirit Kamdar
Section 201Section 271C

TDS compliance was also made at that time. The Cochin Bench of Tribunal considered the liability to deduct tax at source in relation to the assessee before before them on the interest payment prescribed under section 194A and observed that the said section used the term „any income by way of interest‟ and it held that the provisions of section

VIJAY VYANKATRAO MANE,SADASHIV PEATH vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER , ADDL/JCIT(A)- CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1845/PUN/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Pune01 Apr 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

194A of the Act. disallowance is required to be made as per section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Therefore, the assessing Officer is directed to allow the interest expenditure after making verification of applicability of TDS provisions on interest and after making disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, if required. Accordingly, the Ground

ANJALI PUSHKAR HINGANE,,NASHIK vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(3),, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2837/PUN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.2837/Pun/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year : 2012-13 Anjali Pushkar Hingane, Prop. M/S Areen Petroleum Services, Saikheda Phata, At Post Chandori, Taluka- Niphad, Dist. Nashik. अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan : Abiph8603F …. Vs. Ito, Ward- 1(3), …. ""यथ"/ Respondent Nashik.

For Appellant: Shri Sanket JoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Gawli
Section 194A

1] The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of Rs.5,80,108/- made by the A.O. in respect of interest payment made to M/s. The Sanjivani Gramin Biger Sheti Patsanstha without appreciating that the assessee was not required to deduct TDS in respect of the said payment as per the provisions of section 194A

VYAPARI SAHAKARI BANK MARYADIT,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(4), SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 520/PUN/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

TDS on the interest paid on deposits received from the following categories, who are not members of appellant society: Sr. No. Name of Entity 1 HUF 2 Un Registered Partnership Firms 3 Unregistered Trusts 4 Minor (Not Adult Individual) 5 Co-operative Societies 6 AOP Therefore, AO was of the opinion that addition under the provisions of section

SOLAPUR JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LTD,PUNE vs. ACIT., CIR-2, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 24/PUN/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

TDS on the interest paid on deposits received from the following categories, who are not members of appellant society: Sr. No. Name of Entity 1 HUF 2 Un Registered Partnership Firms 3 Unregistered Trusts 4 Minor (Not Adult Individual) 5 Co-operative Societies 6 AOP Therefore, AO was of the opinion that addition under the provisions of section

SOLAPUR JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LTD,,SOLAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 2,, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1770/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

TDS on the interest paid on deposits received from the following categories, who are not members of appellant society: Sr. No. Name of Entity 1 HUF 2 Un Registered Partnership Firms 3 Unregistered Trusts 4 Minor (Not Adult Individual) 5 Co-operative Societies 6 AOP Therefore, AO was of the opinion that addition under the provisions of section

VYAPARI SAHAKARI BANK MARYADIT,SOLAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -2, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 521/PUN/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

TDS on the interest paid on deposits received from the following categories, who are not members of appellant society: Sr. No. Name of Entity 1 HUF 2 Un Registered Partnership Firms 3 Unregistered Trusts 4 Minor (Not Adult Individual) 5 Co-operative Societies 6 AOP Therefore, AO was of the opinion that addition under the provisions of section

SAMARTH SAHAKARI BANK LTD ,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE - 2 , SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 518/PUN/2020[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

TDS on the interest paid on deposits received from the following categories, who are not members of appellant society: Sr. No. Name of Entity 1 HUF 2 Un Registered Partnership Firms 3 Unregistered Trusts 4 Minor (Not Adult Individual) 5 Co-operative Societies 6 AOP Therefore, AO was of the opinion that addition under the provisions of section

SAMARTH SAHAKARI BANK LTD,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -2 , SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 519/PUN/2020[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

TDS on the interest paid on deposits received from the following categories, who are not members of appellant society: Sr. No. Name of Entity 1 HUF 2 Un Registered Partnership Firms 3 Unregistered Trusts 4 Minor (Not Adult Individual) 5 Co-operative Societies 6 AOP Therefore, AO was of the opinion that addition under the provisions of section

MANDHESHWARI URBAN DEVELOPMENT CO-OP BANK LTD,,SOLAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -1,, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1153/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

TDS on the interest paid on deposits received from the following categories, who are not members of appellant society: Sr. No. Name of Entity 1 HUF 2 Un Registered Partnership Firms 3 Unregistered Trusts 4 Minor (Not Adult Individual) 5 Co-operative Societies 6 AOP Therefore, AO was of the opinion that addition under the provisions of section

SOLAPUR SIDDESHWAR SAHAKARI BANK LTD ,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -1 , SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 517/PUN/2020[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

TDS on the interest paid on deposits received from the following categories, who are not members of appellant society: Sr. No. Name of Entity 1 HUF 2 Un Registered Partnership Firms 3 Unregistered Trusts 4 Minor (Not Adult Individual) 5 Co-operative Societies 6 AOP Therefore, AO was of the opinion that addition under the provisions of section

SOLAPUR JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LTD.,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD - 2(4), SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 25/PUN/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

TDS on the interest paid on deposits received from the following categories, who are not members of appellant society: Sr. No. Name of Entity 1 HUF 2 Un Registered Partnership Firms 3 Unregistered Trusts 4 Minor (Not Adult Individual) 5 Co-operative Societies 6 AOP Therefore, AO was of the opinion that addition under the provisions of section

SOLAPUR SIDDESHWAR SAHAKARI BANK ,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -2, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 516/PUN/2020[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

TDS on the interest paid on deposits received from the following categories, who are not members of appellant society: Sr. No. Name of Entity 1 HUF 2 Un Registered Partnership Firms 3 Unregistered Trusts 4 Minor (Not Adult Individual) 5 Co-operative Societies 6 AOP Therefore, AO was of the opinion that addition under the provisions of section

HEMANT ENTERPRISES,NASHIK vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 394/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Vice- & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Deepa Khare-AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.D. Kulkarni, DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 199Section 234A

194A, section 194B, section 194BB, section 194C, section 194D, section 194E, section 195 and section 196A, the assessee shall not be called upon to pay the tax himself to the extent to which tax has been deducted from that income." 8 ITA.No.394/PUN/2025 (Hemant Enterprises) 20. From the language of section 205, it is clear that once

KUDALE AGRO FOODS,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-14, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1619/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S. ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 197Section 201(1)Section 40

1) of the Act which also applies to the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act held that where deductee being recipient of income has already paid taxes on amount received from deductor, the department once again cannot recover tax from deductor on same income by treating deductor to be assessee-in-default for shortfall in its amount

PRATAP BALAJI NIKAM,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 3,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2226/PUN/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Feb 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Sunil GanooFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal Bhosale
Section 194ASection 201Section 40

1,25,26,093/- on account of non-deduction of TDS under section 194A r.w.s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 4. The assessee