BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

32 results for “TDS”+ Section 191clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi336Mumbai296Bangalore287Patna158Nagpur96Karnataka88Chennai79Kolkata77Indore58Jaipur43Cochin41Raipur39Pune32Ahmedabad28Chandigarh27Hyderabad20Visakhapatnam16Lucknow16Cuttack11Allahabad7Surat7Guwahati6Rajkot4Kerala3Jabalpur3Panaji3Amritsar3SC3Agra3Telangana1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 20146Section 12A36Section 234E33Section 143(3)32TDS25Section 15424Section 10(20)24Section 1124Section 220(2)22Deduction

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. BAJAJ FINANCE LTD., (FORMERLY: BAJAJ AUTO FINANCE LTD.,),, PUNE

In the result, appeal of Revenue and Cross Objections of assessee are dismissed

ITA 356/PUN/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Apr 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.356/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2009-10

For Appellant: Shri Kirit Kamdar
Section 201Section 271C

Section 191 further makes this position clear when it lays down that in a situation TDS mechanism is not provided

PANDHARPUR MUNCIPAL COUNCIL,SOLAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC)- TDS, GHAZIABAD

ITA 312/PUN/2020[2014-15 (Q1-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022

Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 305 To 315/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2015-16 Pandharpur Municipal Council Navi Peth, Pandharpur. . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan : Aaalp1606R बनाम / V/S. Dcit (Cpc)–Tds, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Ghaziabad. द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 06/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Eleven Appeals Is Challenged Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Risen Out Of Separate Orders Of Intimation Passed U/S 154 Of The Act, By Dcit-Cpc, Tds Ghaziabad [For Short “Cpc-Tds”], For Five Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12 To 2015-16. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

Showing 1–20 of 32 · Page 1 of 2

16
Addition to Income13
Natural Justice11
Bench:
For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 154Section 191Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

section 191 of the Act and decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in “Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.” reported in 293 ITR 226(SC), contended that, since more or less all the contractors from whose accounts TDS

PANDHARPUR MUNCIPAL COUNCIL,SOLAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC)- TDS, GHAZIABAD

ITA 313/PUN/2020[2014-15 (Q2-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 305 To 315/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2015-16 Pandharpur Municipal Council Navi Peth, Pandharpur. . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan : Aaalp1606R बनाम / V/S. Dcit (Cpc)–Tds, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Ghaziabad. द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 06/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Eleven Appeals Is Challenged Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Risen Out Of Separate Orders Of Intimation Passed U/S 154 Of The Act, By Dcit-Cpc, Tds Ghaziabad [For Short “Cpc-Tds”], For Five Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12 To 2015-16. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 154Section 191Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

section 191 of the Act and decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in “Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.” reported in 293 ITR 226(SC), contended that, since more or less all the contractors from whose accounts TDS

PANDHARPUR MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,PANDHARPUR vs. DCIT (CPC)-TDS ,GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

ITA 305/PUN/2020[2011-2012(Q 4 - 26 Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 305 To 315/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2015-16 Pandharpur Municipal Council Navi Peth, Pandharpur. . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan : Aaalp1606R बनाम / V/S. Dcit (Cpc)–Tds, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Ghaziabad. द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 06/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Eleven Appeals Is Challenged Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Risen Out Of Separate Orders Of Intimation Passed U/S 154 Of The Act, By Dcit-Cpc, Tds Ghaziabad [For Short “Cpc-Tds”], For Five Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12 To 2015-16. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 154Section 191Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

section 191 of the Act and decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in “Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.” reported in 293 ITR 226(SC), contended that, since more or less all the contractors from whose accounts TDS

PANDHARPUR MUNCIPAL COUNCIL,SOLAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC)- TDS, GHAZIABAD

ITA 307/PUN/2020[2012-13(Q4-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 305 To 315/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2015-16 Pandharpur Municipal Council Navi Peth, Pandharpur. . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan : Aaalp1606R बनाम / V/S. Dcit (Cpc)–Tds, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Ghaziabad. द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 06/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Eleven Appeals Is Challenged Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Risen Out Of Separate Orders Of Intimation Passed U/S 154 Of The Act, By Dcit-Cpc, Tds Ghaziabad [For Short “Cpc-Tds”], For Five Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12 To 2015-16. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 154Section 191Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

section 191 of the Act and decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in “Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.” reported in 293 ITR 226(SC), contended that, since more or less all the contractors from whose accounts TDS

PANDHARPUR MUNCIPAL COUNCIL,SOLAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC)- TDS, GAZIABAD

ITA 310/PUN/2020[2013-14(Q3-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 305 To 315/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2015-16 Pandharpur Municipal Council Navi Peth, Pandharpur. . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan : Aaalp1606R बनाम / V/S. Dcit (Cpc)–Tds, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Ghaziabad. द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 06/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Eleven Appeals Is Challenged Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Risen Out Of Separate Orders Of Intimation Passed U/S 154 Of The Act, By Dcit-Cpc, Tds Ghaziabad [For Short “Cpc-Tds”], For Five Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12 To 2015-16. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 154Section 191Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

section 191 of the Act and decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in “Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.” reported in 293 ITR 226(SC), contended that, since more or less all the contractors from whose accounts TDS

PANDHARPUR MUNCIPAL COUNCIL,SOLAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC)- TDS, GHAZIABAD

ITA 315/PUN/2020[2015-16 (Q1-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 305 To 315/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2015-16 Pandharpur Municipal Council Navi Peth, Pandharpur. . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan : Aaalp1606R बनाम / V/S. Dcit (Cpc)–Tds, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Ghaziabad. द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 06/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Eleven Appeals Is Challenged Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Risen Out Of Separate Orders Of Intimation Passed U/S 154 Of The Act, By Dcit-Cpc, Tds Ghaziabad [For Short “Cpc-Tds”], For Five Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12 To 2015-16. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 154Section 191Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

section 191 of the Act and decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in “Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.” reported in 293 ITR 226(SC), contended that, since more or less all the contractors from whose accounts TDS

PANDHARPUR MUNCIPAL COUNCIL,SOLAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC)- TDS, GHAZIABAD

ITA 306/PUN/2020[2012-13 (Q3-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 305 To 315/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2015-16 Pandharpur Municipal Council Navi Peth, Pandharpur. . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan : Aaalp1606R बनाम / V/S. Dcit (Cpc)–Tds, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Ghaziabad. द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 06/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Eleven Appeals Is Challenged Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Risen Out Of Separate Orders Of Intimation Passed U/S 154 Of The Act, By Dcit-Cpc, Tds Ghaziabad [For Short “Cpc-Tds”], For Five Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12 To 2015-16. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 154Section 191Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

section 191 of the Act and decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in “Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.” reported in 293 ITR 226(SC), contended that, since more or less all the contractors from whose accounts TDS

PANDHARPUR MUNCIPAL COUNCIL,SOLAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC)- TDS, GHAZIABAD

ITA 308/PUN/2020[2013-14(Q1-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 305 To 315/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2015-16 Pandharpur Municipal Council Navi Peth, Pandharpur. . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan : Aaalp1606R बनाम / V/S. Dcit (Cpc)–Tds, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Ghaziabad. द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 06/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Eleven Appeals Is Challenged Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Risen Out Of Separate Orders Of Intimation Passed U/S 154 Of The Act, By Dcit-Cpc, Tds Ghaziabad [For Short “Cpc-Tds”], For Five Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12 To 2015-16. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 154Section 191Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

section 191 of the Act and decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in “Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.” reported in 293 ITR 226(SC), contended that, since more or less all the contractors from whose accounts TDS

PANDHARPUR MUNICIPAL COUNCIL , SOLAPUR,SOLAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CPC)-TDS , GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

ITA 309/PUN/2020[2013-2014 (Q2 - 26 Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 305 To 315/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2015-16 Pandharpur Municipal Council Navi Peth, Pandharpur. . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan : Aaalp1606R बनाम / V/S. Dcit (Cpc)–Tds, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Ghaziabad. द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 06/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Eleven Appeals Is Challenged Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Risen Out Of Separate Orders Of Intimation Passed U/S 154 Of The Act, By Dcit-Cpc, Tds Ghaziabad [For Short “Cpc-Tds”], For Five Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12 To 2015-16. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 154Section 191Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

section 191 of the Act and decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in “Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.” reported in 293 ITR 226(SC), contended that, since more or less all the contractors from whose accounts TDS

PANDHARPUR MUNCIPAL COUNCIL,SOLAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC)- TDS, GHAZIABAD

ITA 311/PUN/2020[2013-14 (Q4-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 305 To 315/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2015-16 Pandharpur Municipal Council Navi Peth, Pandharpur. . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan : Aaalp1606R बनाम / V/S. Dcit (Cpc)–Tds, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Ghaziabad. द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 06/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Eleven Appeals Is Challenged Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Risen Out Of Separate Orders Of Intimation Passed U/S 154 Of The Act, By Dcit-Cpc, Tds Ghaziabad [For Short “Cpc-Tds”], For Five Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12 To 2015-16. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 154Section 191Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

section 191 of the Act and decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in “Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.” reported in 293 ITR 226(SC), contended that, since more or less all the contractors from whose accounts TDS

PANDHARPUR MUNCIPAL COUNCIL,SOLAPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC)- TDS, GHAZIABAD

ITA 314/PUN/2020[2014-15 (Q4-26Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 305 To 315/Pun/2020 निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2015-16 Pandharpur Municipal Council Navi Peth, Pandharpur. . . . . . . . अपीऱधर्थी / Appellant Pan : Aaalp1606R बनाम / V/S. Dcit (Cpc)–Tds, . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Ghaziabad. द्वारा / Appearances Assessee By : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue By : Shri M. G. Jasnani सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 06/09/2022 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 09/09/2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench; The Present Bunch Of Eleven Appeals Is Challenged Against The Separate Orders Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Pune [For Short “Cit(A)”] Passed U/S 250 Of Income-Tax Act, 1961 [For Short “The Act”], Which Risen Out Of Separate Orders Of Intimation Passed U/S 154 Of The Act, By Dcit-Cpc, Tds Ghaziabad [For Short “Cpc-Tds”], For Five Assessment Years [For Short “Ay”] 2011-12 To 2015-16. Itat-Pune Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri M. G. Jasnani
Section 154Section 191Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

section 191 of the Act and decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in “Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.” reported in 293 ITR 226(SC), contended that, since more or less all the contractors from whose accounts TDS

M/S. T - 3 ENERGY SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.,,PUNE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 826/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune02 Feb 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.826/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11 M/S. T-3 Energy Services India Pvt. Ltd., D-Ii/65-1, Midc, Telco Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Chinchwad, Pune – 411019 …. Pan: Aacct9805F Vs. The Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Range – 10, Pune

For Appellant: S/Shri Arijit Chakravarty and Shraddha SwarupFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Aggarwal
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)Section 92C

191/-. The Assessing Officer referred the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for computing arm's length price in respect of international transactions entered into by the assessee with its associated enterprises. The TPO vide order dated 10.10.2013 under section 92CA(3) of the Act accepted international transactions of assessee at ₹ 19,48,32,921/- with its associated enterprises

MANOJ S. GUGALE,,AHMEDNAGAR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,,

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 1327/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1327/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Manoj S. Gugale 652, Shantisadan, Topkhana, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Ahmednagar …. Pan: Adzpg9595N Vs. The Income Tax Officer, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Ward 3, Ahmednagar

For Appellant: Shri Suhas P. BoraFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Ghei
Section 271(1)(c)Section 271B

section 271(1)(c) of the Act at ₹ 4,39,162/-. 4. Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee for the year under consideration had furnished return of income declaring total income of ₹ 4,52,640/-. The case of assessee was picked up for scrutiny. The Assessing Officer noted that there was difference of TDS as per 26AS

NIHILENT TECHNOLOGIES P.LTD.,PUNE vs. ITO, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed in the terms aforesaid

ITA 2428/PUN/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 92C

191/- after reducing unabsorbed depreciation of Rs.44,79,000/- and adding back MAT credit entitlement claimed by assessee Rs.52,65,565/-. The Assessing Officer while computing book profit under MAT provisions has placed reliance on the decision of AAR in the case of Rastriya Ispat Nigam Ltd. (supra). We find that the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal

M/S. HONEYWELL AUTOMATION INDIA LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 446/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Mar 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Kamal ShaneyFor Respondent: Smt. Nandita Kanchan
Section 10ASection 10A(7)

section 190 and 191, it may be established that the procedure for deduction of tax at source is only a made for collection of tax. Hence, it cannot be believed to be the source of income credit for a taxpayer. The provisions relating to "collection and recovery at tax-deducted at source" are machinery-provisions for effectuating collection and recovery

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. HONEYWELL AUTOMATION INDIA LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 473/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune06 Mar 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Kamal ShaneyFor Respondent: Smt. Nandita Kanchan
Section 10ASection 10A(7)

section 190 and 191, it may be established that the procedure for deduction of tax at source is only a made for collection of tax. Hence, it cannot be believed to be the source of income credit for a taxpayer. The provisions relating to "collection and recovery at tax-deducted at source" are machinery-provisions for effectuating collection and recovery

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 NASSHIK, NASHIK vs. HARSH CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 302/PUN/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2014-15 Dcit, Circle – 1, Harsh Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Nashik Sanskruti, Murkute Colony, Vs. New Pandit Colony, Sharanpur Road, Nashik – 422002 Pan: Aacch2277H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Dhiraj S. Dandgaval Department By : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 03-07-2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 10-07-2024 O R D E R Per R.K. Panda, Vp : This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 20.12.2023 Of The Cit(A) / Nfac, Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The Revenue In The Grounds Of Appeal Has Challenged The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A) In Restricting The Disallowance To Rs.2,24,191/- As Against Rs.1,25,51,607/- Proposed By The Assessing Officer In The Remand Report As Against Rs.4,38,96,880/- Added By Him In The Order Passed U/S.143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’).

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj S. DandgavalFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 133Section 133(5)Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

191/- as against Rs.1,25,51,607/- proposed by the Assessing Officer in the remand report as against Rs.4,38,96,880/- added by him in the order passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 3. Facts of the case in brief, are that the assessee is a company engaged

TETRA PAK INDIA PVT. LTD.,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of assessee for assessment year

ITA 635/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Mar 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar
Section 143(3)

191,654,869 8 Cost Allocation Received 15,126,588 9 Reimbursement received from Associates 38,032,427 10 Reimbursement paid to Associates 57,686,719 2.1 To benchmark international transactions the assessee applied Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the most appropriate method. The Profit Level Indicator (Operating Profit/Sales) of the assessee and comparables for Packaging solutions segment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE vs. M/S. TETRA PAK INDIA PVT. LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee for assessment year

ITA 665/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Mar 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Kumar
Section 143(3)

191,654,869 8 Cost Allocation Received 15,126,588 9 Reimbursement received from Associates 38,032,427 10 Reimbursement paid to Associates 57,686,719 2.1 To benchmark international transactions the assessee applied Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) as the most appropriate method. The Profit Level Indicator (Operating Profit/Sales) of the assessee and comparables for Packaging solutions segment