BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

39 results for “TDS”+ Section 186clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi252Mumbai224Karnataka90Bangalore82Chennai76Pune39Hyderabad36Jaipur33Ahmedabad30Indore29Raipur27Kolkata25Lucknow24Visakhapatnam20Chandigarh14Cuttack10Surat7Amritsar3Rajkot3Nagpur3Agra2Dehradun2Cochin2Allahabad2SC1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 234C48Section 234E45Section 200A34TDS29Section 143(3)24Section 153A24Limitation/Time-bar17Disallowance16Addition to Income15Section 40

M/S. T - 3 ENERGY SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.,,PUNE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 826/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune02 Feb 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.826/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11 M/S. T-3 Energy Services India Pvt. Ltd., D-Ii/65-1, Midc, Telco Road, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Chinchwad, Pune – 411019 …. Pan: Aacct9805F Vs. The Jt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Range – 10, Pune

For Appellant: S/Shri Arijit Chakravarty and Shraddha SwarupFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Aggarwal
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)Section 9(1)(vii)Section 92C

TDS as the income was chargeable to tax in the hands of recipient. However, the only distinction was that payment in the case was routed through associated enterprise on the basis of back to back bills, which was claimed as reimbursement. Referring to the ratio laid down by the Mumbai Bench of Tribunal in C.U. Inspections

Showing 1–20 of 39 · Page 1 of 2

14
Section 270A8
Section 578

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. SKODA AUTO A.S.,, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 787/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.787/Pun/2015 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Ms. Divya Bajpai, CITFor Respondent: S/Shri Nikhil Pathak &
Section 10Section 143(3)

section, payment made in pursuance to the agreement was to be approved by the Govt. of India and in the case of assessee, approval granted by the Govt. of India had already lapsed and did not cover the relevant financial years. 4. The second issue raised by the Revenue is against the order of DRP in directing the Assessing Officer

MAJALGAON ART SCI & COMMERCE COLLEGE BEED,MAJALGAON vs. ITO TDS WARD, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed

ITA 1109/PUN/2023[A.Y- 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Nov 2023

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Digambar SurwaseFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 154Section 154(7)Section 155Section 186Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234E

TDS have been perused. On perusal of the records it is seen that the order u/s 200A was passed on 08.07.2014 and the appellant has filed rectification application on 16.03.2023. As per section 154(7) the rectification application should be filed within 4 years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be amended

PADMAKAR VISHWAS DATE,BHOSARI vs. INCOME TAX E ASSESSMENT , PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 929/PUN/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Feb 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.929, 930 & 931/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Padmakar Vishwas Date, The Income Tax Officer S.No.218, Near Shri Krishn V –Tds(2), Pune. Mandir, Alandi Road, S Bhosari, Pune – 411038. Pan: Anhpd3804B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Sourabh Nayak – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 15/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 26.06.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.929/Pun/2023 For A.Y.2013-14

Section 201Section 234Section 234ESection 246ASection 250

186 in respect of any assessment for the assessment year commencing on or before the 1st day of April, 1992 or any earlier assessment year; (ha) an order made under section 201; (hb) an order made under sub-section (6A) of section 206C; (i) an order made under section 237; 78[(ia) an order made under section 239A

PADMAKAR VISHWAS DATE,BHOSARI vs. INCOME TAX E ASSESSMENT, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 931/PUN/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Feb 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.929, 930 & 931/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Padmakar Vishwas Date, The Income Tax Officer S.No.218, Near Shri Krishn V –Tds(2), Pune. Mandir, Alandi Road, S Bhosari, Pune – 411038. Pan: Anhpd3804B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Sourabh Nayak – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 15/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 26.06.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.929/Pun/2023 For A.Y.2013-14

Section 201Section 234Section 234ESection 246ASection 250

186 in respect of any assessment for the assessment year commencing on or before the 1st day of April, 1992 or any earlier assessment year; (ha) an order made under section 201; (hb) an order made under sub-section (6A) of section 206C; (i) an order made under section 237; 78[(ia) an order made under section 239A

PADMAKAR VISHWAS DATE,,BHOSARI vs. INCOME TAX E ASSESSMENT, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 930/PUN/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Feb 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.929, 930 & 931/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Padmakar Vishwas Date, The Income Tax Officer S.No.218, Near Shri Krishn V –Tds(2), Pune. Mandir, Alandi Road, S Bhosari, Pune – 411038. Pan: Anhpd3804B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Sourabh Nayak – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 15/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 26.06.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.929/Pun/2023 For A.Y.2013-14

Section 201Section 234Section 234ESection 246ASection 250

186 in respect of any assessment for the assessment year commencing on or before the 1st day of April, 1992 or any earlier assessment year; (ha) an order made under section 201; (hb) an order made under sub-section (6A) of section 206C; (i) an order made under section 237; 78[(ia) an order made under section 239A

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 235/PUN/2021[2014-15 (26Q - Qtr 1)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 227/PUN/2021[2013-14(24Q- Qtr3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SPADEWORK SOFTWARE SERVICES P LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC) -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 172/PUN/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022AY 2013-14
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SPADEWORK SOFTWARE SERVICES P LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC) -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 173/PUN/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022AY 2014-15
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SPADEWORK SOFTWARE SERVICES P LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC) -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 174/PUN/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022AY 2015-16
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 233/PUN/2021[2014-15 (24Q - Qtr 3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 231/PUN/2021[2014-1524Q - Qtr 1)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 234/PUN/2021[2014-15 24Q - Qtr 4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 230/PUN/2021[2013-14 (26Q - Qtr 4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 237/PUN/2021[2015-16 (24Q - Qtr 2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 226/PUN/2021[2013-14 (24Q- Qtr2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 236/PUN/2021[2015-16 (24Q - Qtr 1)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 229/PUN/2021[2013-14 (26Q - Qtr 2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

ITA 238/PUN/2021[2015-16 (24Q - Qtr 3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 Jun 2022
For Respondent: Shri M.G. Jasnani
Section 200ASection 234E

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total