PADMAKAR VISHWAS DATE,BHOSARI vs. INCOME TAX E ASSESSMENT, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.929, 930 & 931/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Padmakar Vishwas Date, The Income Tax Officer S.No.218, Near Shri Krishn V –Tds(2), Pune. Mandir, Alandi Road, S Bhosari, Pune – 411038. Pan: Anhpd3804B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Sourabh Nayak – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 15/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 26.06.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.929/Pun/2023 For A.Y.2013-14

186 in respect of any assessment for the assessment year commencing on or before the 1st day of April, 1992 or any earlier assessment year; (ha) an order made under section 201; (hb) an order made under sub-section (6A) of section 206C; (i) an order made under section 237; 78[(ia) an order made under section 239A

PADMAKAR VISHWAS DATE,,BHOSARI vs. INCOME TAX E ASSESSMENT, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.929, 930 & 931/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Padmakar Vishwas Date, The Income Tax Officer S.No.218, Near Shri Krishn V –Tds(2), Pune. Mandir, Alandi Road, S Bhosari, Pune – 411038. Pan: Anhpd3804B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Sourabh Nayak – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 15/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 26.06.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.929/Pun/2023 For A.Y.2013-14

186 in respect of any assessment for the assessment year commencing on or before the 1st day of April, 1992 or any earlier assessment year; (ha) an order made under section 201; (hb) an order made under sub-section (6A) of section 206C; (i) an order made under section 237; 78[(ia) an order made under section 239A

PADMAKAR VISHWAS DATE,BHOSARI vs. INCOME TAX E ASSESSMENT , PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.929, 930 & 931/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Padmakar Vishwas Date, The Income Tax Officer S.No.218, Near Shri Krishn V –Tds(2), Pune. Mandir, Alandi Road, S Bhosari, Pune – 411038. Pan: Anhpd3804B Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Sourabh Nayak – Addl.Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 15/02/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 16/02/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 All Dated 26.06.2023. Since Issue Involved Is Same, All These Appeals Were Heard Together & Decided By This Consolidated Order. We Treat Appeal In Ita No.929/Pun/2023 For A.Y.2013-14

186 in respect of any assessment for the assessment year commencing on or before the 1st day of April, 1992 or any earlier assessment year; (ha) an order made under section 201; (hb) an order made under sub-section (6A) of section 206C; (i) an order made under section 237; 78[(ia) an order made under section 239A

SPADEWORK SOFTWARE SERVICES P LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC) -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SPADEWORK SOFTWARE SERVICES P LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC) -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SPADEWORK SOFTWARE SERVICES P LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CPC) -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total

SHATABDI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH,AGASKHIND vs. ACIT, CPC(TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA No

186 2013 2013 2013 15th May 20th July 20th July 04 66 66 2013 2013 2013 7. The returns mentioned above were accepted by the TIN. Subsequently, Dy. CIT Centralised Processing Cell TDS vide his order dated 10-06-2014 and 03-10-2016 levied a late fee of Rs. 2,12,000 as follows: Form 24Q Form 26Q Total