BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

58 results for “TDS”+ Section 161(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi403Mumbai378Bangalore126Karnataka88Kolkata83Chandigarh78Cochin67Chennai63Hyderabad62Ahmedabad60Pune58Jaipur58Raipur31Indore19Lucknow14Surat11Patna8Rajkot7Visakhapatnam6Jodhpur3Dehradun3Nagpur2Cuttack2SC2Ranchi1Jabalpur1Amritsar1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 234E173Section 154135Section 200A72TDS48Addition to Income46Section 12A36Natural Justice28Rectification u/s 15427Section 10(20)24Section 11

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE -5, PUNE vs. SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA PVT LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 323/PUN/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Sept 2022AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Percy PardiwallaFor Respondent: Shri J. P. Chadraker
Section 10ASection 14ASection 35Section 35(1)

TDS provisions. As regards, the claim for allowance as revenue expenditure on product development expenditure of Rs.4,19,75,171/-, the ld. CIT(A) allowed the same following the Tribunal’s order in assessee’s own case for the assessment year 2008-09. Being aggrieved by the decision of the ld. CIT(A), the Revenue is in appeal before

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PANVEL CIRCLE PANVEL vs. OUTABOX MEDIA SOLUTIONS LLP, GHATKOPAR MUMBAI

Showing 1–20 of 58 · Page 1 of 3

24
Section 143(3)23
Section 26314

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 177/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune07 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Gunjan H KakkadFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)

TDS challan. From the various details furnished by the assessee, the Assessing Officer noted that these were not sufficient to verify its genuineness. The assessee has not provided the complete addresses of the parties to carry out the third party verification. He observed that the different vendors of the assessee have same PAN and he reproduced some of the instances

M/S KIRAN SANRAN ASSOCIATES,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 791/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Naveen RanderFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 2Section 263Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43BSection 43C

1)(va) of the Act. Further, the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court was pronounced subsequent to the passing of the assessment order, therefore, there is no error on the order of the Assessing Officer so as to invoke the provisions of section 263 of the Act. 10 11. So far as the applicability of provisions of section 269SS

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 545/PUN/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS credit. The assessee also took an additional ground before the CIT(A)-I, Thane for allowance of exemption u/s 11. The CIT(A)-I, Thane rejected the additional ground taken by the assessee and exemption u/s 11 had not been allowed to the assessee. Against ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 the order of the CIT(A), Thane, the assessee preferred

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 543/PUN/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS credit. The assessee also took an additional ground before the CIT(A)-I, Thane for allowance of exemption u/s 11. The CIT(A)-I, Thane rejected the additional ground taken by the assessee and exemption u/s 11 had not been allowed to the assessee. Against ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 the order of the CIT(A), Thane, the assessee preferred

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 544/PUN/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS credit. The assessee also took an additional ground before the CIT(A)-I, Thane for allowance of exemption u/s 11. The CIT(A)-I, Thane rejected the additional ground taken by the assessee and exemption u/s 11 had not been allowed to the assessee. Against ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 the order of the CIT(A), Thane, the assessee preferred

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1155/MUM/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS credit. The assessee also took an additional ground before the CIT(A)-I, Thane for allowance of exemption u/s 11. The CIT(A)-I, Thane rejected the additional ground taken by the assessee and exemption u/s 11 had not been allowed to the assessee. Against ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 the order of the CIT(A), Thane, the assessee preferred

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1153/MUM/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS credit. The assessee also took an additional ground before the CIT(A)-I, Thane for allowance of exemption u/s 11. The CIT(A)-I, Thane rejected the additional ground taken by the assessee and exemption u/s 11 had not been allowed to the assessee. Against ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 the order of the CIT(A), Thane, the assessee preferred

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1154/MUM/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS credit. The assessee also took an additional ground before the CIT(A)-I, Thane for allowance of exemption u/s 11. The CIT(A)-I, Thane rejected the additional ground taken by the assessee and exemption u/s 11 had not been allowed to the assessee. Against ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 the order of the CIT(A), Thane, the assessee preferred

BHARAT KESHAVLAL SHAH,,PUNE vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -3,, PUNE

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 855/PUN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune13 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Sarvesh KhandelwalFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR
Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 199Section 199(1)Section 23Section 263Section 36(1)(iii)Section 43BSection 56(2)(vii)

TDS claim vis- à-vis income offered to tax u/s.199(1) and deemed rent issue with 4 ITA.No.855/PUN/2019 Shri Bharat Keshavlal Shah, Pune. liberty to raise appropriate contentions before the Assessing Officer in consequential proceedings. Rejected in very terms. 7. This leaves us with the first and foremost issue of PCIT's revision directions regarding the applicability of interest

REKHA KISHORE BARI,DHULE vs. ASSESSING OFFICER-NFAC, DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1667/PUN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1667/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2020-21 Rekha Kishore Bari, V The Assessing Officer- Datta Bari Bhavan, S Nfac. Opp.Rana Pratap Statute, Dhule – 424001. Pan: Abepb3597J Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Bhuvanesh Kankani – Ar Revenue By Shri Sandeep P Sathe – Jcit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 09/12/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 27/01/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac] For Assessment Year 2020-21 Dated 19.07.2024 Passed U/Sec.250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, Emanating From The Assessment Order U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144B Of The Act, Dated 31/08/2022. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 3GSection 56(2)

161 taxmann.com 301(Delhi). Findings & Analysis : 4. We have heard both the parties and perused the records. Basic facts of this case are as under : 4.1 The assessee had filed return of income for A.Y.2020-21 on 19/12/2020 declaring total income at Rs.42,87,800/- and agricultural income of Rs.20,000/-. The said return was processed under section 143(1

DECAN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1,PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 663/PUN/2023[2013-14(24Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jun 2023

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200ASection 234E

1 660/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 2 661/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 3 662/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental

DECAN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1,PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 660/PUN/2023[2013-14(24Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jun 2023

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200ASection 234E

1 660/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 2 661/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 3 662/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental

DECAN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1,PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 662/PUN/2023[2013-14(26Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jun 2023

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200ASection 234E

1 660/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 2 661/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 3 662/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental

DECAN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1,PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 661/PUN/2023[2013-14(26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jun 2023

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200ASection 234E

1 660/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 2 661/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 3 662/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental

DECAN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1,PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 664/PUN/2023[2013-14(24Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jun 2023

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200ASection 234E

1 660/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 2 661/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 3 662/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental

DECAN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1,PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 665/PUN/2023[2013-14(26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jun 2023

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200ASection 234E

1 660/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 2 661/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 3 662/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental

DECAN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1,PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 666/PUN/2023[2014-15((24Q-Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Jun 2023

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200ASection 234E

1 660/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 2 661/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental ITO, 2013-14 Q2 Consultants Private Limited, TDS-1, Pune 5/43/14 Prasad Apartment, Erandwana, Pune City, Deccan Gymkhana S.O., Pune-411004 PAN : AACCD9040J 3 662/PUN/2023 Deccan Environmental

M/S. CHEM-TECH LABORATORISE PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-TDS, PUNE

In the result, both appeals of the assessee i

ITA 486/PUN/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita Nos.485 & 486/Pun/2020 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S.Chem-Tech Laboratories The Deputy Commissioner Pvt. Ltd., Vs Of Income Tax, Cpc(Tds), S-22, Parvati Industrial Estate, Pune. Pune-Satara Road, Pune-411009. Pan: Aaecc 3473 E Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri Arvind Desai– Dr Date Of Hearing 22/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 23/06/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals), Pune-10 For The A.Y.2013-14 & 2014-15 Respectively, Both Dated 04.03.2020. Since The Facts & Issue Involved In Both The Appeals Are Same, Therefore, Both The Appeals Are Clubbed, Heard & Are Decided Together By A Consolidated Order. For The Sake Of Convenience, We Take The Appeal In Ita No.485/Pun/2020 For A.Y.2013-14 As Lead Case.

Section 200ASection 234E

161 ITD 313) dated 23.09.2016 and Maharashtra Cricket Association v/s. DCIT (ITA No.560/PN/2016) dated 21.09.2016 and hence , the late fees u/s.234E levied in the instant case ought to have been deleted. ITA Nos.485 & 486/PUN/2020 for A.Y. 2013-14 & 14-15 M/s.Chem-Tech Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, CPC(TDS), Pune (A) (02 Appeals) 4] The learned CIT(A) erred

M/S. CHEM-TECH LABORATORISE PVT. LTD,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC-TDS, PUNE

In the result, both appeals of the assessee i

ITA 485/PUN/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune23 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita Nos.485 & 486/Pun/2020 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/S.Chem-Tech Laboratories The Deputy Commissioner Pvt. Ltd., Vs Of Income Tax, Cpc(Tds), S-22, Parvati Industrial Estate, Pune. Pune-Satara Road, Pune-411009. Pan: Aaecc 3473 E Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri Arvind Desai– Dr Date Of Hearing 22/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 23/06/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals), Pune-10 For The A.Y.2013-14 & 2014-15 Respectively, Both Dated 04.03.2020. Since The Facts & Issue Involved In Both The Appeals Are Same, Therefore, Both The Appeals Are Clubbed, Heard & Are Decided Together By A Consolidated Order. For The Sake Of Convenience, We Take The Appeal In Ita No.485/Pun/2020 For A.Y.2013-14 As Lead Case.

Section 200ASection 234E

161 ITD 313) dated 23.09.2016 and Maharashtra Cricket Association v/s. DCIT (ITA No.560/PN/2016) dated 21.09.2016 and hence , the late fees u/s.234E levied in the instant case ought to have been deleted. ITA Nos.485 & 486/PUN/2020 for A.Y. 2013-14 & 14-15 M/s.Chem-Tech Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, CPC(TDS), Pune (A) (02 Appeals) 4] The learned CIT(A) erred