CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD.,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

15][In favour of revenue]. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a charging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be levied even without section 200A. 2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which processes the TDS

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

15][In favour of revenue]. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a charging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be levied even without section 200A. 2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which processes the TDS

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

15][In favour of revenue]. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a charging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be levied even without section 200A. 2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which processes the TDS

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

15][In favour of revenue]. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a charging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be levied even without section 200A. 2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which processes the TDS

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

15][In favour of revenue]. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a charging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be levied even without section 200A. 2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which processes the TDS

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

15][In favour of revenue]. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a charging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be levied even without section 200A. 2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which processes the TDS

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

15][In favour of revenue].\nThe Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a\ncharging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be\nlevied even without section 200A.\n2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which\nprocesses the TDS

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

15][In favour of revenue].\nThe Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a\ncharging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be\nlevied even without section 200A.\n2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which\nprocesses the TDS

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. AURANGABAD , AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

15][In favour of revenue].\nThe Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a\ncharging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be\nlevied even without section 200A.\n2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which\nprocesses the TDS

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

15][In favour of revenue].\nThe Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a\ncharging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be\nlevied even without section 200A.\n2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which\nprocesses the TDS

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

15][In favour of revenue].\nThe Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a\ncharging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be\nlevied even without section 200A.\n2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which\nprocesses the TDS

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. ,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

15][In favour of revenue].\nThe Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a\ncharging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be\nlevied even without section 200A.\n2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which\nprocesses the TDS

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

15][In favour of revenue].\nThe Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a\ncharging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be\nlevied even without section 200A.\n2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which\nprocesses the TDS

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, CPC TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

15][In favour of revenue].\nThe Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a\ncharging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be\nlevied even without section 200A.\n2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which\nprocesses the TDS

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. ,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

15][In favour of revenue].\nThe Hon'ble Gujarat High Court has already held that section 234E is a\ncharging provision and therefore the fee prescribed u/s 234E could be\nlevied even without section 200A.\n2.3 It is to be mentioned that the CPC, Ghaziabad is the CPC which\nprocesses the TDS

HUTATMA JAIWANTRAO PATIL GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL & JUNIOR COLLEGE HIMAYATNAGAR,HIMAYAT NAGAR vs. CIT TDS NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoresl.

Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with reference to Rule No 15 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, should have been issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer in the Form No 7 for the TDS

HUTATMA JAIWANTRAO PATIL GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL & JUNIOR COLLEGE HIMAYATNAGAR,HIMAYATNAGAR NANDED vs. ITO TDS, NANDED

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoresl.

Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with reference to Rule No 15 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, should have been issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer in the Form No 7 for the TDS

HUTATMA JAIWANTRAO PATIL GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL & JUNIOR COLLEGE HIMAYATNAGAR,HIMAYAT NAGAR vs. CIT TDS NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoresl.

Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with reference to Rule No 15 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, should have been issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer in the Form No 7 for the TDS