BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 144Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata27Delhi23Bangalore20Mumbai16Patna13Chennai10Lucknow9Indore6Nagpur5Jaipur3Chandigarh2Guwahati2Raipur2Pune2Rajkot1Ahmedabad1Cochin1Hyderabad1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 26310Section 14A4Section 1473Section 143(3)3

SHARADA ELECTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. PCIT, PUNE-3, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1432/PUN/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Sept 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamore

For Appellant: Shri Kishor B. PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 263

TDS. Appellant contends that, receivers of the related income are either not eligible to suffer disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), or, ought to have offered the related income to "TAXATION" for AY 2020-21. 8. Learned PCIT-3, Pune erred in law and on facts in not appreciating that, income of Rs.64,93,534/- relating to sale of electricity power

SHRI GANESH SERVA SEVA SANGHA SHRIPUR,SOLAPUR vs. CIT(E), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1230/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1230/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Pratik SandbhorFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 263

TDS were not bought to tax. This resulted in underassessment of the total income of the assessee thereby rendering the order erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. 4. In view of the above facts, the overall assessment order 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Act dated 30.03.2022 is erroneous and is prejudicial