BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

30 results for “TDS”+ Section 135clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi313Mumbai299Bangalore142Karnataka86Hyderabad76Chennai75Kolkata72Cochin62Ahmedabad48Jaipur47Chandigarh44Raipur43Visakhapatnam41Indore30Pune30Cuttack22Lucknow20Surat15Amritsar13Rajkot12Nagpur10Allahabad4Varanasi4Agra3Guwahati3Dehradun3Panaji3Telangana3SC2Patna2Jabalpur2Punjab & Haryana2Ranchi1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 80I51Section 12A36Section 143(3)26Section 10(20)24Section 1124Addition to Income15Section 14813TDS13Section 201(1)12Section 201

BANK OF INDIA (AMBABI MANDIR BRANCH),,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TDS,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 141/PUN/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm Sl. No. Ita No. Name Of Appellant Name Of Respondent Asst. Year 1 130/Pun/2019 Bank Of India Ito, Tds, 2010-11 (Gaganbawada Branch), Kolhapur Plot No.209, At & Post & Tal. Gagan Bawda, Kolhapur Pan: Aaacb0472C 2 137/Pun/2019 Bank Of India (Rukadi Ito, Tds, 2010-11 Branch), Kolhapur Kapila Niwas, C.S. No.1047, East, At & Post Rukadi, Tal. Hatkanangale, Kolhapur Pan: Aaacb0472C 3 141/Pun/2019 Bank Of India (Ambabi Ito, Tds, 2010-11 Mandir Branch), Kolhapur 135, “C", Swaroop Chambers, 2Nd Floor, Mahadwar Marg, Kolhapur Pan: Aaacb0472C Assessee By Shri Nikhil Pathak Shri Mayuresh Doshi Revenue By Shri A. K. Modi Shri Rajesh Gawali Date Of Hearing 15.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement 25.07.2019 आदेश / Order Per Bench : There Are 3 Appeals Under Consideration Filed By The Different Branches Of Bank Of India For The Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. The Facts, Issues, Written Submissions & Arguments Of Counsels Are Similar In All The Above 3 Appeals And, Therefore, We Proceed To Consolidate All These Appeals & Dispose Of By This Composite Order.

Section 194ASection 197ASection 200Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS, 2010-11 Mandir Branch), Kolhapur 135, “C", Swaroop Chambers, 2nd Floor, Mahadwar Marg, Kolhapur PAN: AAACB0472C Assessee by Shri Nikhil Pathak Shri Mayuresh Doshi Revenue by Shri A. K. Modi Shri Rajesh Gawali Date of hearing 15.07.2019 Date of pronouncement 25.07.2019 आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH : There are 3 appeals under consideration filed by the different branches of Bank

Showing 1–20 of 30 · Page 1 of 2

12
Deduction9
Exemption9

BANK OF INDIA (RUKADI BRANCH),,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TDS,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 137/PUN/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm Sl. No. Ita No. Name Of Appellant Name Of Respondent Asst. Year 1 130/Pun/2019 Bank Of India Ito, Tds, 2010-11 (Gaganbawada Branch), Kolhapur Plot No.209, At & Post & Tal. Gagan Bawda, Kolhapur Pan: Aaacb0472C 2 137/Pun/2019 Bank Of India (Rukadi Ito, Tds, 2010-11 Branch), Kolhapur Kapila Niwas, C.S. No.1047, East, At & Post Rukadi, Tal. Hatkanangale, Kolhapur Pan: Aaacb0472C 3 141/Pun/2019 Bank Of India (Ambabi Ito, Tds, 2010-11 Mandir Branch), Kolhapur 135, “C", Swaroop Chambers, 2Nd Floor, Mahadwar Marg, Kolhapur Pan: Aaacb0472C Assessee By Shri Nikhil Pathak Shri Mayuresh Doshi Revenue By Shri A. K. Modi Shri Rajesh Gawali Date Of Hearing 15.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement 25.07.2019 आदेश / Order Per Bench : There Are 3 Appeals Under Consideration Filed By The Different Branches Of Bank Of India For The Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. The Facts, Issues, Written Submissions & Arguments Of Counsels Are Similar In All The Above 3 Appeals And, Therefore, We Proceed To Consolidate All These Appeals & Dispose Of By This Composite Order.

Section 194ASection 197ASection 200Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS, 2010-11 Mandir Branch), Kolhapur 135, “C", Swaroop Chambers, 2nd Floor, Mahadwar Marg, Kolhapur PAN: AAACB0472C Assessee by Shri Nikhil Pathak Shri Mayuresh Doshi Revenue by Shri A. K. Modi Shri Rajesh Gawali Date of hearing 15.07.2019 Date of pronouncement 25.07.2019 आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH : There are 3 appeals under consideration filed by the different branches of Bank

BANK OF INDIA (GAGANBAWADA BRANCH),,KOLHAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TDS,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 130/PUN/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Jul 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm Sl. No. Ita No. Name Of Appellant Name Of Respondent Asst. Year 1 130/Pun/2019 Bank Of India Ito, Tds, 2010-11 (Gaganbawada Branch), Kolhapur Plot No.209, At & Post & Tal. Gagan Bawda, Kolhapur Pan: Aaacb0472C 2 137/Pun/2019 Bank Of India (Rukadi Ito, Tds, 2010-11 Branch), Kolhapur Kapila Niwas, C.S. No.1047, East, At & Post Rukadi, Tal. Hatkanangale, Kolhapur Pan: Aaacb0472C 3 141/Pun/2019 Bank Of India (Ambabi Ito, Tds, 2010-11 Mandir Branch), Kolhapur 135, “C", Swaroop Chambers, 2Nd Floor, Mahadwar Marg, Kolhapur Pan: Aaacb0472C Assessee By Shri Nikhil Pathak Shri Mayuresh Doshi Revenue By Shri A. K. Modi Shri Rajesh Gawali Date Of Hearing 15.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement 25.07.2019 आदेश / Order Per Bench : There Are 3 Appeals Under Consideration Filed By The Different Branches Of Bank Of India For The Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. The Facts, Issues, Written Submissions & Arguments Of Counsels Are Similar In All The Above 3 Appeals And, Therefore, We Proceed To Consolidate All These Appeals & Dispose Of By This Composite Order.

Section 194ASection 197ASection 200Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS, 2010-11 Mandir Branch), Kolhapur 135, “C", Swaroop Chambers, 2nd Floor, Mahadwar Marg, Kolhapur PAN: AAACB0472C Assessee by Shri Nikhil Pathak Shri Mayuresh Doshi Revenue by Shri A. K. Modi Shri Rajesh Gawali Date of hearing 15.07.2019 Date of pronouncement 25.07.2019 आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH : There are 3 appeals under consideration filed by the different branches of Bank

SONAL SANDEEP SATAV,PUNE vs. PCIT, PUNE-2, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 945/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Astha Chandra & Shree G.D. Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Sarang GudhateFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Keshari
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS on the commission paint was negligible. Paragraph 5 deals with the expenditure incurred fowants research and development Paragraph 6 deals with the issue of depreciation on UPS. Finally, paragraph 7 deals with computation on the basis of the opinion in paragraphs 4.5 and 6. Thus, on the issue of deduction under section 100 of the IT Act, there

SATISH VISHNU THOMBARE, INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AHMEDNAGAR, AHMEDNAGAR vs. VARSHA PRAFULLA ZENDE, AHMEDNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1656/PUN/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 Oct 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1656/Pun/2024 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2010-11 Satish Vishnu Thombare, Varsha Prafulla Zende, Income Tax Officer, Prop Of Bleach Chem Enterprises, Ward-1, Ahmednagar Vs. Industrial Estate, Shrirampur, Maharashtra-413709 Pan : Aabpz2541C अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent Assessee By : Miss Shivani Shah (Virtual) Department By : Shri Akhilesh Srivastva Date Of Hearing : 06-08-2025 Date Of 29-10-2025 Pronouncement : आदेश / Order

For Appellant: Miss Shivani Shah (Virtual)For Respondent: Shri Akhilesh Srivastva
Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68

135 taxmann.com is reproduced here as under: “5. On 31/03/2019, Respondent No.1 uploaded a notice under Section 148 of the Act and reasons for reopening the assessment on the ITBA portal, informing that the assessment for AY 2014-15 has been reopened and requested the Petitioner to file a return of income for that year. The notice was uploaded

M/S KIRAN SANRAN ASSOCIATES,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 791/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Naveen RanderFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 2Section 263Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43BSection 43C

135 Sq FT * 25% * Rs.6387 per Sq FT) 4 Sub Total (1+2+3) 74,69,940 5 Additional 5% as the Project is on a Plot of 3,73,503 land exceeding 1 Hectare 6 Valuation for the purpose of payment of Stamp 78,43,443 Duty The copy of the relevant building plan and floor plan are enclosed

LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1178/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jun 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Dr. P. Daniel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri B. Kishore
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

135 of Paperbook for Case Laws) Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee for the year under consideration had furnished the return of income declaring total income of Rs.1,26,07,123/- on 31.10.2007. Search and seizure operations were carried out on the premises of assessee on 23.09.2009. In response to notice issued under section 153A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, KOLHAPUR vs. VIJAYKUMAR RAJARAM SHAH,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 608/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jun 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Dr. P. Daniel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri B. Kishore
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

135 of Paperbook for Case Laws) Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee for the year under consideration had furnished the return of income declaring total income of Rs.1,26,07,123/- on 31.10.2007. Search and seizure operations were carried out on the premises of assessee on 23.09.2009. In response to notice issued under section 153A

LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1179/PUN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jun 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Dr. P. Daniel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri B. Kishore
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

135 of Paperbook for Case Laws) Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee for the year under consideration had furnished the return of income declaring total income of Rs.1,26,07,123/- on 31.10.2007. Search and seizure operations were carried out on the premises of assessee on 23.09.2009. In response to notice issued under section 153A

LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,,KOLHAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1177/PUN/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jun 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Dr. P. Daniel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri B. Kishore
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

135 of Paperbook for Case Laws) Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee for the year under consideration had furnished the return of income declaring total income of Rs.1,26,07,123/- on 31.10.2007. Search and seizure operations were carried out on the premises of assessee on 23.09.2009. In response to notice issued under section 153A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1246/PUN/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jun 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Dr. P. Daniel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri B. Kishore
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

135 of Paperbook for Case Laws) Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee for the year under consideration had furnished the return of income declaring total income of Rs.1,26,07,123/- on 31.10.2007. Search and seizure operations were carried out on the premises of assessee on 23.09.2009. In response to notice issued under section 153A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1247/PUN/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jun 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Dr. P. Daniel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri B. Kishore
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

135 of Paperbook for Case Laws) Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee for the year under consideration had furnished the return of income declaring total income of Rs.1,26,07,123/- on 31.10.2007. Search and seizure operations were carried out on the premises of assessee on 23.09.2009. In response to notice issued under section 153A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD.,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1245/PUN/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jun 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravi, Jm Sl.

For Appellant: Shri Dr. P. Daniel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri B. Kishore
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)

135 of Paperbook for Case Laws) Briefly, in the facts of the case, the assessee for the year under consideration had furnished the return of income declaring total income of Rs.1,26,07,123/- on 31.10.2007. Search and seizure operations were carried out on the premises of assessee on 23.09.2009. In response to notice issued under section 153A

INCOME TAX OFFICER, PUNE vs. SAGAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the CO filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1812/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Suhas Bora and Riya OswalFor Respondent: Shri S. Sadananda Singh, JCIT
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 269SSection 37Section 68

TDS certificates / 15G forms for verification. The assessee filed an application for admission of additional evidences under Rule 46A before the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC. The invocation of 6 CO No.43/PUN/2025 provisions of section 115BBE of the Act was also challenged before the Ld. CIT(A) / NFAC. 8. Based on the arguments advanced by the assessee

KOTHARI AGRITECH PRIVATE LIMITED,SOLAPUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1, SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Partly Allowed

ITA 2354/PUN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr.Dipak P. Ripote & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2354/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Kothari Agritech Private V The Dcit, Limited, S Circle-1, Solapur. 3Rd Floor, Sunplaza, 8516/11, Subhash Chowk, Murarji Peth, Solapur North, Jawaharlal Nehru Vastigrah S.O., Solapur – 413001. Maharashtra Pan: Aadck8017H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Mr.Piyush Bafna – Ar Revenue By Shri Ramnath P Murkunde – Dr Date Of Hearing 24/04/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 20/05/2025 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961; Dated 19.09.2024 For Assessment Year 2015-16. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :

Section 250

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; dated 19.09.2024 for Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal : ITA No.2354/PUN/2024 [A] “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT-Appeal has erred in upholding the disallowance of commission expenses to the extent of Rs 45,24,707, which

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 543/PUN/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS credit. The assessee also took an additional ground before the CIT(A)-I, Thane for allowance of exemption u/s 11. The CIT(A)-I, Thane rejected the additional ground taken by the assessee and exemption u/s 11 had not been allowed to the assessee. Against ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 the order of the CIT(A), Thane, the assessee preferred

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 545/PUN/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS credit. The assessee also took an additional ground before the CIT(A)-I, Thane for allowance of exemption u/s 11. The CIT(A)-I, Thane rejected the additional ground taken by the assessee and exemption u/s 11 had not been allowed to the assessee. Against ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 the order of the CIT(A), Thane, the assessee preferred

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1154/MUM/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS credit. The assessee also took an additional ground before the CIT(A)-I, Thane for allowance of exemption u/s 11. The CIT(A)-I, Thane rejected the additional ground taken by the assessee and exemption u/s 11 had not been allowed to the assessee. Against ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 the order of the CIT(A), Thane, the assessee preferred

JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ACIT PANVEL, PANVEL

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 1153/MUM/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS credit. The assessee also took an additional ground before the CIT(A)-I, Thane for allowance of exemption u/s 11. The CIT(A)-I, Thane rejected the additional ground taken by the assessee and exemption u/s 11 had not been allowed to the assessee. Against ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 the order of the CIT(A), Thane, the assessee preferred

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST,, RAIGAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all the three appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 544/PUN/2016[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Sept 2025AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandra

For Appellant: S/Shri Madhur Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: S/Shri Sham Walve, Special Counsel along with Tanzil Padvekar and Bhavik Chheda
Section 10(20)Section 11Section 12ASection 142Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS credit. The assessee also took an additional ground before the CIT(A)-I, Thane for allowance of exemption u/s 11. The CIT(A)-I, Thane rejected the additional ground taken by the assessee and exemption u/s 11 had not been allowed to the assessee. Against ITA Nos.1153, 1155 & 1154/MUM/2016 the order of the CIT(A), Thane, the assessee preferred