CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD.,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing instructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to formulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided by the provisions of law. 2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is the relevant legislation, of which,section

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing instructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to formulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided by the provisions of law. 2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is the relevant legislation, of which,section

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing instructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to formulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided by the provisions of law. 2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is the relevant legislation, of which,section

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing instructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to formulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided by the provisions of law. 2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is the relevant legislation, of which,section

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing instructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to formulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided by the provisions of law. 2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is the relevant legislation, of which,section

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT LTD,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing instructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to formulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided by the provisions of law. 2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is the relevant legislation, of which,section

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

119 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing\ninstructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to\nformulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided\nby the provisions of law.\n2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is\nthe relevant legislation, of which, section

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

119 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing\ninstructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to\nformulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided\nby the provisions of law.\n2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is\nthe relevant legislation, of which,section

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. AURANGABAD , AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

119 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing\ninstructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to\nformulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided\nby the provisions of law.\n2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is\nthe relevant legislation, of which, section

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. ,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

119 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing\ninstructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to\nformulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided\nby the provisions of law.\n2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is\nthe relevant legislation, of which,section

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

119 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing\ninstructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to\nformulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided\nby the provisions of law.\n2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is\nthe relevant legislation, of which,section

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

119 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing\ninstructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to\nformulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided\nby the provisions of law.\n2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is\nthe relevant legislation, of which,section

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, CPC TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

119 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing\ninstructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to\nformulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided\nby the provisions of law.\n2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is\nthe relevant legislation, of which, section

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

119 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing\ninstructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to\nformulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided\nby the provisions of law.\n2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is\nthe relevant legislation, of which,section

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. ,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

119 of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961, provides a discretionary power to the CBDT for issuing\ninstructions/orders/directions to the officers. However, the power to\nformulate any scheme, rules or procedures has to be explicitly provided\nby the provisions of law.\n2.3 In the context of the present dispute, the Income Tax Act, 1961,is\nthe relevant legislation, of which, section

INCOME TAX OFFICER, BODHI TOWER vs. KUMAR BUILDERS PROJECT PUNE PRIVATE LIMITED, BUND GARDEN

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2019-20

TDS credit of Rs.4,02,541/- thereby claiming a refund of Rs.4,02,541/-. The return was revised on 06.03.2020 claiming income tax refund of Rs.2541/- and carry forward loss of Rs.3,95,51,713/-. However, the CPC did not allow the claim of carry forward 2 business loss of Rs.3,95,51,713/- as claimed in the return

NALINI TUKARAM NIKAM,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 2(3), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2747/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2017-18

119/- while passing the assessment order stating that this interest income is taxable in my hands, however, the Ld. AO did not give me any TDS credit w.r.t. the interest income. I have already submitted that I have not claimed any TDS credit appearing in my 26AS which is attributable to the said interest income as the said interest itself

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX vs. D.M. CORPORATION PVT. LTD.,, KOLHAPUR

In the result, appeals of Revenue for assessment years 2006-07 to 2009-10 are allowed and for assessment years 2010-11 to 2012-13 are dismissed

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita Nos.1805 To 1811/Pun/2014 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2006-07 To 2012-13 The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Central Circle, Kolhapur …. Vs. D.M. Corporation Pvt. Ltd., 240/B, Mohite House, Gen. Thorat Marg, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Tarabai Park, Kolhapur Pan: Aadcm6281H

119(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was sought from the Central Board of Direct Taxes for such delay." ITA Nos.1805 to 1811/PUN/2014 3 2. Whether in law the assessee was entitled to the claim of deduction under section 80IA(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the additional income admitted in statement under section