SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS statements sub- section (2) of section 200A gives the power to the Board to frame the Scheme for Centralised Processing of statements. 23. Now in sub-section (2) of section 200A along with mentioning the words determining the “tax payable or refund due” is also followed by the words “as required under the sub- section (1

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS statements sub- section (2) of section 200A gives the power to the Board to frame the Scheme for Centralised Processing of statements. 23. Now in sub-section (2) of section 200A along with mentioning the words determining the “tax payable or refund due” is also followed by the words “as required under the sub- section (1

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS statements sub- section (2) of section 200A gives the power to the Board to frame the Scheme for Centralised Processing of statements. 23. Now in sub-section (2) of section 200A along with mentioning the words determining the “tax payable or refund due” is also followed by the words “as required under the sub- section (1

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS statements sub- section (2) of section 200A gives the power to the Board to frame the Scheme for Centralised Processing of statements. 23. Now in sub-section (2) of section 200A along with mentioning the words determining the “tax payable or refund due” is also followed by the words “as required under the sub- section (1

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS statements sub- section (2) of section 200A gives the power to the Board to frame the Scheme for Centralised Processing of statements. 23. Now in sub-section (2) of section 200A along with mentioning the words determining the “tax payable or refund due” is also followed by the words “as required under the sub- section (1

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT LTD,AURANGABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

TDS statements sub- section (2) of section 200A gives the power to the Board to frame the Scheme for Centralised Processing of statements. 23. Now in sub-section (2) of section 200A along with mentioning the words determining the “tax payable or refund due” is also followed by the words “as required under the sub- section (1

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS return/statements within the prescribed time in\nsub-section (3) of section 200. The fee prescribed is Rs.200 for every day\nduring which the failure continues. Sub-section (2) further stipulates that\nthe amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. AURANGABAD , AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS return/statements within the prescribed time in\nsub-section (3) of section 200. The fee prescribed is Rs.200 for every day\nduring which the failure continues. Sub-section (2) further stipulates that\nthe amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS return/statements within the prescribed time in\nsub-section (3) of section 200. The fee prescribed is Rs.200 for every day\nduring which the failure continues. Sub-section (2) further stipulates that\nthe amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

section 200A(1) provide for the manner of\nprocessing of TDS statement and section 200A(2) of the Act\nprovides

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS return/statements within the prescribed time in\nsub-section (3) of section 200. The fee prescribed is Rs.200 for every day\nduring which the failure continues. Sub-section (2) further stipulates that\nthe amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS return/statements within the prescribed time in\nsub-section (3) of section 200. The fee prescribed is Rs.200 for every day\nduring which the failure continues. Sub-section (2) further stipulates that\nthe amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, CPC TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS return/statements within the prescribed time in\nsub-section (3) of section 200. The fee prescribed is Rs.200 for every day\nduring which the failure continues. Sub-section (2) further stipulates that\nthe amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. ,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS return/statements within the prescribed time in\nsub-section (3) of section 200. The fee prescribed is Rs.200 for every day\nduring which the failure continues. Sub-section (2) further stipulates that\nthe amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. ,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS return/statements within the prescribed time in\nsub-section (3) of section 200. The fee prescribed is Rs.200 for every day\nduring which the failure continues. Sub-section (2) further stipulates that\nthe amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

TDS return/statements within the prescribed time in\nsub-section (3) of section 200. The fee prescribed is Rs.200 for every day\nduring which the failure continues. Sub-section (2) further stipulates that\nthe amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE -5, PUNE vs. SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA PVT LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed

section 35(2AB) in respect of product development expenditure. However, the prescribed authority i.e. DSIR had only certified that only a sum of Rs.80,48,24,167/- was eligible for weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) and the DSIR had not certified the expenditure claimed on clinical trial expenses amounting to Rs.4,19,75,171/- and payments made to certain parties

DCIT, SWARGATE PUNE vs. CUMMINS INDIA LTD , PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

1) cannot override or add any requirement to the explicit\nterms of the provision i.e. section 10AA to make\na\ndisallowance/adjustment if there is no such explicit\nrequirement in the main provision itself i.e. section 10AA.\n8. Reliance in this regard is placed on the following decisions\nwherein it has been held that machinery provisions cannot\noverride