BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

611 results for “TDS”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,107Mumbai1,857Bangalore682Pune611Chennai535Ahmedabad386Kolkata362Hyderabad324Jaipur318Indore233Raipur214Chandigarh190Karnataka151Cochin137Nagpur117Surat109Visakhapatnam102Cuttack94Jabalpur94Rajkot84Lucknow61Dehradun43Jodhpur34Guwahati33Agra31Amritsar30Allahabad29Ranchi24Panaji23Patna16Telangana15SC13Varanasi11Calcutta3Orissa2Kerala2

Key Topics

Section 234E409Section 200A193TDS85Penalty56Section 270A40Section 271H37Section 14836Addition to Income34Section 15431Section 250

DEPUTY COLLECTOR OFFICE,,UDGIR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS RANGE,, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 319/PUN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune04 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.319/Pun/2019 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : - Deputy Collector Office, The Jcit, Tds, Range, Main Road, Udgir, Tq.Udgir, Vs Nashik. Dist.Latur - 413517. Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri S P Walimbe – Dr Date Of Hearing 29/06/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 04/07/2022 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-2, Aurangabad Arising Out Of Assessing Officer’S Order Section 272A(2)(K) R.W.S 200(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Also Called As ‘The Act’) Dated 26.11.2018. 2. The Only Issue Involved In This Appeal Is Levy Of Penalty U/S.272A(2)(K) Of The Act. The Assessing Officer Vide Order Dated 05/02/2014 Levied Penalty U/S.272A(2)(K) Of The Act For Delay In Filling Quarterly Statements Of Tax Deducted At Source (Tds) U/S.200(3) Of The Act.

Section 192Section 198Section 199Section 200Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)Section 273B

Showing 1–20 of 611 · Page 1 of 31

...
23
Condonation of Delay22
Section 271(1)(c)21

penalty u/s.272A(2)(k) of the Act for delay in filling Quarterly Statements of tax deducted at Source (TDS) u/s.200

MAHARASHTRA JEEVAN PRADHIKARAN,,PARBHANI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, (TDS) RANGE -NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2410/PUN/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 May 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 2410/Pun/2017 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran Works Division, Parbhani-431 401 Tan : Nskm04669A .......अपीलाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri S.P Walimbe
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(K)Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS statements within the specified time without any reasonable cause and accordingly, levied penalty of Rs.2,55,700/- u/s.272A(2)(k) of the Act. 3. The Ld. CIT(Appeals

NISAR MEHBOOB ALAM KHAN,,AURANGABAD vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 2026/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.2026/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Nisar Mehboob Alam Khan N K Construction, Plot No.22, Motiwala Nagar, Opp. Mgm Hospital, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Aurangabad …. Pan: Akgpk5798P Vs. The Jt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent Tds Range, Nashik

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms Sabana Parveen
Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)Section 273B

penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) of Rs.52,175/- for late filing of TDS Returns without appreciating that the appellant was prevented

DIRECTOR, VJNT OBC & SBC WELFARE, MS, PUNE,,PUNE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 906/PUN/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Apr 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.906/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri K. SrinivasanFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Jha
Section 2(31)Section 272(2)(K)Section 272A(2)(k)Section 273B

Penalty, on the basis of letter signed by the Joint Director Directorate of VJNT, OBC & SBC Welfare MS Pune filled before AO should have been dropped, there is no loss of revenue to the Income Tax Department, only technical defect remained. All TDS

PRAVIN CHATARBHUJ BAJAJ,,AHMEDNAGAR vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 933/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Feb 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.933/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Pravin Chatarbhuj Bajaj, M/S. Hi-Tech Engineers, Plot No.F-68, Midc Area, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Ahmednagar …. Pan: Adhpb0700E Vs. The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent (Tds) Range, Pune

For Appellant: Shri Pramod ShingteFor Respondent: Shri Hitendra Ninawe
Section 192Section 198Section 199Section 200Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS) Range, Pune Assessee by : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue by : Shri Hitendra Ninawe घोषणा की तारीख / सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement: 09.02.2018 Date of Hearing : 06.02.2018 आदेश / ORDER PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM: The appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of CIT(A), Pune-10, dated 03.02.2016 relating to assessment year 2011-12 against penalty

M/S. L.N. KUNJIR,,PUNE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 1050/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Jun 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.1050/Pun/2016 यििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. L.B. Kunjir, 52/1, Swanand Building, Shri Ram Hsg. Society, Chandan Nagar, अऩीऱाथी/Appellant Pune – 411014 …. Pan: Aabfl9816E Vs. The Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax …. प्रत्यथी / Respondent (Tds) Range, Pune

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Modi
Section 192Section 198Section 199Section 200Section 272A(2)(k)Section 273B

penalty under section 272A(2)(k) of the Act in respect of 1st quarter of assessment year 2011-12. The case of assessee was that only because the assessee was not conversant with the e-filing procedure of various e-forms with the Department, there had been delay in uploading the requisite return i.e. TDS

GANGAMAI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,,DHULE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC (TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1176/PUN/2018[2017-18 (Q4/24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: None
Section 154Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS) Ghaziabad had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.93,600/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.02.2018 passed u/s 200A

GANGAMAI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,,DHULE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC (TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1172/PUN/2018[2016-17 (Q1-24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: None
Section 154Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS) Ghaziabad had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.93,600/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.02.2018 passed u/s 200A

GANGAMAI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,,DHULE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC (TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1175/PUN/2018[2017-18 (Q2/24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: None
Section 154Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS) Ghaziabad had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.93,600/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.02.2018 passed u/s 200A

GANGAMAI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,,DHULE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC (TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1173/PUN/2018[2016-17 ( Q2/24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: None
Section 154Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS) Ghaziabad had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.93,600/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.02.2018 passed u/s 200A

GANGAMAI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,,DHULE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC (TDS),, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1174/PUN/2018[2016-17 (Q3/24Q)]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Jun 2022

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: None
Section 154Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS) Ghaziabad had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.93,600/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.02.2018 passed u/s 200A

THE UNIQUE ACADEMY,,PUNE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1034/PUN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Mar 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri D.Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर आयकर अपील आयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं. / Ita No.1034/Pun/2016 अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 वष"

For Appellant: Shri S.N. PuranikFor Respondent: Dr. Vivek Aggarwal, CIT-DR
Section 272(2)(k)Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS) has levied penalty of Rs.43,400/- under above section for delay in filing form/return of TDS. (ii) It will

RAMCHANDRA BHAGWANRAO DESHMUKH,NANDED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 317/PUN/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Jun 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.317/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12 Ramchandra Bhagwanrao The Commissioner Of Deshmukh, Vs Income Tax(Tds), 46, Bhagyanagar Road, Ashok Nashik. Nagar, Nanded – 431605. Pan: Acapd 3508 Q Assessee/ Appellant Respondent /Revenue Assessee By None Revenue By Shri M.G.Jasnani – Dr Date Of Hearing 02/05/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 26/06/2023 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeal) National Faceless Appeal Centre[Ld.Cit(A)], Delhi Dated 21.02.2023 For A.Y.2011-12 Emanating From The Penalty Order Under Section 272A(2)(K) Of The Act, Dated 31.05.2013. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Delay In Submission Of Tds Return Was Not Deliberately But Due To Awareness Of Submission Of Tds Return Through Electronic System As This Electronic System Of Submission Is Complecated & Not Understandable. The Agency Authorize By Dit (System), Nsdl Was Ramchandra Bhagwanrao Deshmukh [A]

Section 200(3)Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS statement are as under as mentioned in the penalty order : 4. Thus, there was substantial delay in filing the TDS

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 161/PUN/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.161 To 169/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vitthalrao Urhe, Vs. Ito, Tds & Dcit, 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Tds, Cpc, Ghaziabad. Punchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune, Maval- 410506. Pan : Aaapu9881D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 09.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi Dated 16.03.2021 For The Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Nine Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.161/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2014-15 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.56,800/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.05.2014 passed u/s 200A r.w.s

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 165/PUN/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.161 To 169/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vitthalrao Urhe, Vs. Ito, Tds & Dcit, 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Tds, Cpc, Ghaziabad. Punchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune, Maval- 410506. Pan : Aaapu9881D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 09.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi Dated 16.03.2021 For The Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Nine Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.161/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2014-15 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.56,800/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.05.2014 passed u/s 200A r.w.s

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 164/PUN/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.161 To 169/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vitthalrao Urhe, Vs. Ito, Tds & Dcit, 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Tds, Cpc, Ghaziabad. Punchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune, Maval- 410506. Pan : Aaapu9881D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 09.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi Dated 16.03.2021 For The Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Nine Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.161/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2014-15 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.56,800/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.05.2014 passed u/s 200A r.w.s

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 162/PUN/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.161 To 169/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vitthalrao Urhe, Vs. Ito, Tds & Dcit, 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Tds, Cpc, Ghaziabad. Punchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune, Maval- 410506. Pan : Aaapu9881D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 09.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi Dated 16.03.2021 For The Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Nine Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.161/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2014-15 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.56,800/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.05.2014 passed u/s 200A r.w.s

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 163/PUN/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.161 To 169/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vitthalrao Urhe, Vs. Ito, Tds & Dcit, 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Tds, Cpc, Ghaziabad. Punchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune, Maval- 410506. Pan : Aaapu9881D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 09.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi Dated 16.03.2021 For The Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Nine Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.161/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2014-15 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.56,800/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.05.2014 passed u/s 200A r.w.s

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 167/PUN/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.161 To 169/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vitthalrao Urhe, Vs. Ito, Tds & Dcit, 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Tds, Cpc, Ghaziabad. Punchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune, Maval- 410506. Pan : Aaapu9881D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 09.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi Dated 16.03.2021 For The Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Nine Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.161/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2014-15 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.56,800/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.05.2014 passed u/s 200A r.w.s

DADASAHEB VITTHALRAO URHE,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 8,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 168/PUN/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Pune15 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.161 To 169/Pun/2021 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Dadasaheb Vitthalrao Urhe, Vs. Ito, Tds & Dcit, 5, Abhijeet Engineers, Tds, Cpc, Ghaziabad. Punchwati Colony, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune, Maval- 410506. Pan : Aaapu9881D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde Date Of Hearing : 09.09.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.09.2022 आदेश / Order Per Bench : These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi Dated 16.03.2021 For The Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16 Respectively. 2. Since The Identical Facts & Common Issues Are Involved In All The Above Captioned Nine Appeals, We Proceed To Dispose Of The Same By This Common Order. 3. For The Sake Of Convenience & Clarity, The Facts Relevant To The Appeal In Ita No.161/Pun/2021 For The Assessment Year 2014-15 Are Stated Herein.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P. Murkunde
Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234ESection 271HSection 271H(1)(a)Section 272ASection 272A(2)

TDS had levied penalty of late fee of Rs.56,800/- u/s 234E by intimation dated 02.05.2014 passed u/s 200A r.w.s