SUHAS JAGANNATH KANASE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1), PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI MANISH BORAD (Accountant Member), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

natural justice The Appellant prays that the disallowance of Rs. 2,398/- be deleted. Ground No.7 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has erred in initiating penalty proceedings under section 270A of the Act. It is prayed that the Learned AO be directed to drop the penalty proceedings GENERAL

SHRI P.M. CHORDIA,JALNA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006-07

natural justice. The assessee is directed to furnish necessary documents with regard to his claim. After considering the same, CIT(A) shall pass a speaking order. Accordingly, ground No.4 raised in appeal by assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Additional ground No. 5 relating to addition of Rs.32,132/- 28. By the additional ground No.5, assessee has challenged the addition

SHRI P.M. CHORDIA,JALNA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006-07

natural justice. The assessee is directed to furnish necessary documents with regard to his claim. After considering the same, CIT(A) shall pass a speaking order. Accordingly, ground No.4 raised in appeal by assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Additional ground No. 5 relating to addition of Rs.32,132/- 28. By the additional ground No.5, assessee has challenged the addition

SHRI P.M. CHORDIA,JALNA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER,, AURANGABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee for assessment year 2006-07

natural justice. The assessee is directed to furnish necessary documents with regard to his claim. After considering the same, CIT(A) shall pass a speaking order. Accordingly, ground No.4 raised in appeal by assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Additional ground No. 5 relating to addition of Rs.32,132/- 28. By the additional ground No.5, assessee has challenged the addition

M/S. HONEYWELL AUTOMATION INDIA LIMITED,,PUNE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 11,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms. Sushma Chowla, Jm & Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.171/Pun/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/S. Honeywell Automation India Limited, 56/57, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Hadapsar, Pune-411013. अपीलाथ"/Appellant Pan : Aaact3904F …. Vs. Acit, Circle-11, …. ""थ" / Respondent Pune. Assessee By : Shri Kamal Sawhney & Ms. Rhea Amar Revenue By : Ms. Amrita Mishra सुनवाई क" तारीख / घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 25.06.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 24.07.2019 आदेश / Order Per D. Karunakara Rao, Am : This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Assessing Officer/Tpo/Drp For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. Referring To The Grounds Before Us, Ld. Counsel For The Assessee Submitted That The Grounds No.1, 14, 15 & 17 To 19 Are Required To Be Dismissed As They Are Of Either Consequential Or Premature Or General In Nature. Accordingly, They Are Dismissed. Therefore, The Rest Of Grounds No.2 To 13 & 16 Are Extracted Hereunder :-

TDS component benefit, they are taking it entirety. If the assessee is not able to reconcile the difference, then the AO may add the amount in difference to the income of the assessee. With these observations, this ground is set aside to the file of the AO for adjudication. Needless to say, principle of natural justice

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. ,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

natural justice is\nthe prevention of miscarriage of justice.\n8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely\nunintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The\nappellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of\napproximately Rs.40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs.28 lakhs\nby discharging the same. Further, all steps

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

natural justice is\nthe prevention of miscarriage of justice.\n8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely\nunintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The\nappellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of\napproximately Rs.40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs.28 lakhs\nby discharging the same. Further, all steps

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. ,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

natural justice is\nthe prevention of miscarriage of justice.\n8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely\nunintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The\nappellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of\napproximately Rs.40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs.28 lakhs\nby discharging the same. Further, all steps

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

natural justice is\nthe prevention of miscarriage of justice.\n8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely\nunintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The\nappellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of\napproximately Rs.40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs.28 lakhs\nby discharging the same. Further, all steps

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, CPC TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

natural justice is\nthe prevention of miscarriage of justice.\n8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely\nunintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The\nappellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of\napproximately Rs.40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs.28 lakhs\nby discharging the same. Further, all steps

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

natural justice is\nthe prevention of miscarriage of justice.\n8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely\nunintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The\nappellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of\napproximately Rs.40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs.28 lakhs\nby discharging the same. Further, all steps

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

natural justice is\nthe prevention of miscarriage of justice.\n8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely\nunintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The\nappellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of\napproximately Rs.40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs.28 lakhs\nby discharging the same. Further, all steps

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

natural justice is\nthe prevention of miscarriage of justice.\n8.\nGiven the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely\nunintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The\nappellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of\napproximately Rs.40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs.28 lakhs\nby discharging the same. Further, all steps

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD. AURANGABAD , AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK , NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the\nrespective assessee's in ITA Nos

natural justice is\nthe prevention of miscarriage of justice.\n8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely\nunintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The\nappellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of\napproximately Rs.40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs.28 lakhs\nby discharging the same. Further, all steps

SHRI BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH. SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

natural justice is the prevention of miscarriage of justice. 8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely unintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The appellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of approximately Rs. 40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs. 28 lakhs by discharging the same. Further

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

natural justice is the prevention of miscarriage of justice. 8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely unintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The appellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of approximately Rs. 40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs. 28 lakhs by discharging the same. Further

CHATE TUTORIALS PVT. LTD.,AURANGABAD vs. LD. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

natural justice is the prevention of miscarriage of justice. 8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely unintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The appellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of approximately Rs. 40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs. 28 lakhs by discharging the same. Further

SHREE BHASKARACHARYA PRATISHTHAN,CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR vs. LD. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the bunch of appeals filed by the respective assessee’s in ITA Nos

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita Nos.476 To 480/Pun/2024 Chate Tutorials Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit,Tds Circle, Chate House, Plot No.4, Nashik Near N-2 Cricket Stadium, Cidco, Aurangabad – 431 003 Maharashtra Tan : Nskco1565E Appellant Respondent

natural justice is the prevention of miscarriage of justice. 8. Given the above, the applicants submit that the delay is purely unintentional, bonafide and hence, needs to be condoned. The appellants have been representing at all levels. In fact, the dues of approximately Rs. 40 lakh rupees were brought down to Rs. 28 lakhs by discharging the same. Further