ARJUN BHAGARAM PARMAR,RATNAGIRI vs. WARD-1, RATNAGIRI, RATNAGIRI
In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as per terms indicated herein above
ITA 115/PUN/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2025AY 2017-2018
Bench: Dr. Manish Boradआयकर अपील सं / Ita No.115/Pun/2025 धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Arjun Bhagaram Parmar, Vs Ward-1, Room No. 11, Swar Vihar, Ratnagiri Garah Sankulan Sarang, Khend, Tal-Chiplun, Ratnagiri-415605 Maharashtra Pan-Ayqpm4825M Appellant Respondent
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Tripathi
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 44A
demonetization period at Rs. 4,23,000/- and addition for estimated profits @ 10%
on the remaining credits in the bank found to be from business transactions. In the paper book filed by the assessee which is running in 72 pages assessee has filed various details including financial statement purchases/sale bills, registration certificate, computation of income, Tax Challan, Form 26AS
