UDAYKUMAR VYAS,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 1 (5), BSNL RTTC BUILDING
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 262/NAG/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 Apr 2026AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Royudaykumar Vyas, Ito, Ward – 1(5) Flat No. 402, Lepresting Vs Nagpur Apartment, Plot No. 105- 106, Ramdaspeth, Nagpur. Pan : Aarpv 4578 K Assessee Respondent
For Appellant: Shri Sameer Wazalwar, CAFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar, CIT DR
Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250Section 50C
price.
3. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend, or withdraw any of the above grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing.
3. Brief facts of the case are that assessee is an individual, engaged in the business of land development and plot trading, filed his return of income for AY 2013-14 declaring total income
