AMAR KASERA (HUF),PATNA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

iii) copy of bank account. Thereafter, from time to time, the Assessing Officer asked the assessee to furnish the requisite details to verify the aforesaid claim which were duly furnished by the assessee as is revealed from the copy of the order sheet. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee has also relied on the paper book page 24A to submit

AMAR KASERA (HUF),PATNA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

iii) copy of bank account. Thereafter, from time to time, the Assessing Officer asked the assessee to furnish the requisite details to verify the aforesaid claim which were duly furnished by the assessee as is revealed from the copy of the order sheet. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee has also relied on the paper book page 24A to submit

AMAR KASERA (HUF),PATNA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee stand allowed

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Shri Sanjay Awasthi

iii) copy of bank account. Thereafter, from time to time, the Assessing Officer asked the assessee to furnish the requisite details to verify the aforesaid claim which were duly furnished by the assessee as is revealed from the copy of the order sheet. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee has also relied on the paper book page 24A to submit

ACIT, CIRCLE-4, PATNA vs. SH. SURESH , PATNA

transfer of lands as arose to the assesse. (ii) Ld. CIT(A) erred in holding Rupam Tower as Residential House and has erred in allowing deduction u/s 54 to the LTCG arising to the assessee. (iii) Ld. CIT(A) erred in accepting the claim of the assessee regarding the cost of construction of the Rupam Tower building. He also erred