BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 80G(5)(vi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85Delhi77Bangalore47Jaipur24Ahmedabad24Kolkata21Lucknow18Chennai18Chandigarh13Indore9Hyderabad7Pune6Cuttack5Rajkot5Surat3Patna2Amritsar2Panaji1Raipur1Nagpur1Ranchi1SC1Jabalpur1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 80G6Section 12A4Exemption2Addition to Income2Natural Justice2Limitation/Time-bar2

SHRI NARNAULIYE AGRAWAL SEWA SAMITI,SHERGHATI GAYA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 69/PAT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Sept 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 12ASection 80G

vi) of the Act in Form-10AC dated 01.09.2023 was also cancelled. Similarly, approval granted u/s 80G of the Act was also I.T.A. Nos.: 68 & 69/PAT/2025 Assessment Year: 2025-26 Shri Narnauliye Agrawal Sewa Samiti. cancelled on identical grounds. The Ld. AR requested that the matter may be set aside to the Ld. CIT(E) to grant one more opportunity

SHRI NARNAULIYE AGRAWAL SEWA SAMITI,SHER GHATI GAYA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 68/PAT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Patna
15 Sept 2025
AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 12ASection 80G

vi) of the Act in Form-10AC dated 01.09.2023 was also cancelled. Similarly, approval granted u/s 80G of the Act was also I.T.A. Nos.: 68 & 69/PAT/2025 Assessment Year: 2025-26 Shri Narnauliye Agrawal Sewa Samiti. cancelled on identical grounds. The Ld. AR requested that the matter may be set aside to the Ld. CIT(E) to grant one more opportunity