BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 270A(8)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi208Mumbai178Jaipur62Hyderabad49Ahmedabad48Bangalore36Chennai35Chandigarh32Pune29Rajkot27Lucknow17Guwahati16Surat14Indore14Kolkata9Nagpur9Raipur7Agra5Patna3Jodhpur3Cuttack3Cochin3Amritsar2Dehradun2Allahabad1Ranchi1SC1

Key Topics

Section 270A6Section 270A(9)2Section 2632Addition to Income2

SANGAM ALMIRAH PRIVATE LIMITED,MUZAFFARPUR vs. NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 338/PAT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna27 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 250Section 270ASection 270A(9)

8) of the Act for the year under consideration amounting to Rs. 1,95,748/- is hereby confirmed. 5.4. In view of the facts discussed above, the contentions of the appellant are rejected and the action of the AO levying penalty of Rs. 1,95,748/- u/s 270A of the Act is hereby confirmed. Accordingly Ground Nos.1 to 6 raised

SAWITA SHAH,PURNIA vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), PURNIA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 605/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed
ITAT Patna
01 Jan 2025
AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishrasawita Shah, Income Tax Officer, W/O Kamal Kishor Gupta Sudi Ward 3(1), Purnia Tola, Ansari Thakur Tola, Vs Dalmapur, Baisi, Purnia, Bihar - 854315 (Pan: Gnzps0882J) (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Rakesh Kumar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Ashwani Kr. Singal, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 68

8. For that the other grounds, if any, shall be urged at the time of hearing of appeal.” 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee, Sawita Shah runs a CSP centre. The Assessee had deposited Rs. 13,38,600/- in her Bank account during the period of Demonetization. The case was selected and notices were issued

BALKRISHNA BHALOTIA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,JAMUI vs. PCIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 123/PAT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 263

68,330/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny assessment and a notice under section 143(2) was issued and served upon the assessee on 23.09.2019. It is pertinent to observe that a survey under section 133A of the Income Tax Act was carried out at the business premises of the assessee on 14.09.2017. 2 Assessment