BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 158clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,099Mumbai654Karnataka471Ahmedabad242Jaipur177Bangalore126Chandigarh121Hyderabad118Chennai110Cochin91Kolkata91Indore81Raipur58Pune53Surat52Telangana35Lucknow31Allahabad26Cuttack22Calcutta19Rajkot18Jodhpur17Ranchi16Amritsar13SC13Agra11Nagpur10Varanasi5Panaji5Rajasthan5Guwahati4Patna3Visakhapatnam3Orissa2Uttarakhand2Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 683Addition to Income3Section 2502Section 145(3)2

RAJBANSH RAM,BHABUA vs. ITO WARD- 3(5), SASARAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 351/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 144Section 250Section 68

68 of the Act, which is stated to be fit to be reversed on the ground that no valid show cause notice as mandated in section 251(2) of the Act was I.T.A. No.: 351/PAT/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Rajbansh Ram. issued by the NFAC. Further, the entire transactions and the source of the bank deposits not being

BABULAL PRASAD SUJIT KUMAR,MUZAFFARPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 276/PAT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna
30 Dec 2024
AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 276/Pat/2022 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 Babulal Prasad Sujit Kumar,……………….…Appellant Purani Bazar, Muzaffarpur-842001, Bihar [Pan:Aalfb9242J] -Vs.- Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,.….Respondent Central Circle-Muzaffarpur, Chabdralok Bhawan, Near Chandralok Market, Naya Tola, Muzaffarpur-842002, Bihar Appearances By: Shri A.K. Rastogi, Sr. Advocate & Shri Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: November 26, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: December 30, 2024 O R D E R

Section 68Section 69A

158 of 2002 dated 29th July, 2010, wherein it was clearly held that advances received by the assessee being trade advance, a very nature of activity of the assessee and the same having been adjusted against the sales made to the concerned parties. The said advances could not be treated as unexplained cash credits under section 68

PARAS NATH GUPTA,RAMNA ROAD , GAYA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DC/AC CIRCLE-I

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed in\nview of the above directions

ITA 345/PAT/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Apr 2025AY 2017-2018
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 250

68 by providing identity, genuineness of transactions\nand creditworthiness of the creditors. The assessee failed to submit any of\nthe above during the scrutiny proceedings. Due to the failure of the assessee\nto prove that the entries made in the books of account are genuine and\nreliable, the show cause notice was issued by recording the satisfaction for\nrejection