SMT. ANITA DEVI,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

1) of the Act. It was observed\nby the Id. AO that during the course of search assessee had deposited\ncash of ₹68,293/- with Punjab National bank, Doctor's Colony,\nKankarbagh, patna, which according to the Id. AO could not be\nexplained and accordingly, the same was added to the income of the\nassessee. The Id. AO noted that

SMT. ANITA DEVI,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

1) of the Act. It was observed\nby the Id. AO that during the course of search assessee had deposited\ncash of ₹68,293/- with Punjab National bank, Doctor's Colony,\nKankarbagh, patna, which according to the Id. AO could not be\nexplained and accordingly, the same was added to the income of the\nassessee. The Id. AO noted that

ITO, WARD-2(1), PATNA vs. M/S SUN COMTECH PVT LTD, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

150/- and tax was also paid u/s 115JB of the Act at ₹22,21,835/-. On the basis of the information received from the Investigation Directorate, Kolkata, information was called for from the assessee and after considering the reply received, the assessment was made by assessing the total income at ₹1,11,96,530/- after disallowing a sum of ₹1

SMT. ANITA DEVI,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

1) of the Act. It was observed\nby the Id. AO that during the course of search assessee had deposited\ncash of ₹68,293/- with Punjab National bank, Doctor's Colony,\nKankarbagh, patna, which according to the Id. AO could not be\nexplained and accordingly, the same was added to the income of the\nassessee. The Id. AO noted that

SMT. ANITA DEVI,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

1) of the Act. It was observed\nby the Id. AO that during the course of search assessee had deposited\ncash of ₹68,293/- with Punjab National bank, Doctor's Colony,\nKankarbagh, patna, which according to the Id. AO could not be\nexplained and accordingly, the same was added to the income of the\nassessee. The Id. AO noted that

SMT. ANITA DEVI,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

1) of the Act. It was observed by the ld. AO that during the course of search assessee had deposited cash of ₹68,293/- with Punjab National bank, Doctor’s Colony, Kankarbagh, patna, which according to the ld. AO could not be explained and accordingly, the same was added to the income of the assessee. The ld. AO noted that

SMT. ANITA DEVI,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

1) of the Act. It was observed by the ld. AO that during the course of search assessee had deposited cash of ₹68,293/- with Punjab National bank, Doctor’s Colony, Kankarbagh, patna, which according to the ld. AO could not be explained and accordingly, the same was added to the income of the assessee. The ld. AO noted that