BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 150clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi555Mumbai318Bangalore165Jaipur150Chennai129Hyderabad107Ahmedabad82Chandigarh64Pune48Kolkata45Raipur43Nagpur41Rajkot36Allahabad31Surat27Telangana23Amritsar21Lucknow20Indore16Guwahati12Cuttack10Karnataka9Visakhapatnam5Cochin5Patna5Orissa2SC2Jodhpur2Agra2Ranchi1Uttarakhand1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 2505Section 1485Section 1444Section 1474Addition to Income4Penalty3Limitation/Time-bar3Section 271(1)(c)2Section 143(2)

DOLLY GHOSH,BHAGALPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1 PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 182/PAT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Oct 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 269SSection 269TSection 271DSection 271E

150/-. The appellant has also communicated with the assessing officer. Complying with the request of appellant, the Assessing Officer had provided the reasons u/s 147 of the Act to the appellant. Under the circumstances, it is clear that the appellant had accepted the notice u/s 148, filed return of income in compliance to this notice and also corresponded with

2
Section 271D2
Section 143(3)2
Cash Deposit2

MOHAMMAD NAZIM AHMAD,NALANDA vs. ITO, WARD-2(3), BIHARSHARIFF, BIHARSHARIFF

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 371/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna26 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 151A

147 of the\nAct by issuing notice u/s 148 of the Act on 29.03.2021, which was\ncomplied with by filing a return of income on 28.04.2021, declaring\nincome of ₹7,40,610/-. Thereafter, notice u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of\nthe Act were issued along with questionnaire and were complied with\nby the assessee. The assessee is a fruit

ITO, WARD-2(1), PATNA vs. M/S SUN COMTECH PVT LTD, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 108/PAT/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jun 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 148Section 250

150/- and tax was also paid u/s 115JB of the Act at ₹22,21,835/-. On the basis of the information received from the Investigation Directorate, Kolkata, information was called for from the assessee and after considering the reply received, the assessment was made by assessing the total income at ₹1,11,96,530/- after disallowing

ANIL KUMAR,WEST CHAMPARAN vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), BETTIAH

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 261/PAT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 144Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

u/s 144/147 and penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, dated 21.12.2017 and 30.05.2018, respectively. Since the issues in both the appeals are related to the same assessee, both the appeals were heard together and I.T.A. Nos.: 261 & 262/PAT/2025 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Anil Kumar. are being decided vide this common order for the sake of convenience

ANIL KUMAR,WEST CHAMPARAN vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), BETTIAH

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 262/PAT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 144Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

u/s 144/147 and penalty order under section 271(1)(c) of the Act, dated 21.12.2017 and 30.05.2018, respectively. Since the issues in both the appeals are related to the same assessee, both the appeals were heard together and I.T.A. Nos.: 261 & 262/PAT/2025 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Anil Kumar. are being decided vide this common order for the sake of convenience