BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 14Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai335Delhi170Chennai134Bangalore91Kolkata73Ahmedabad63Jaipur38Raipur34Amritsar34Hyderabad33Pune23Chandigarh18Indore11Jodhpur7Cochin7Guwahati7Cuttack6Lucknow3Orissa2Panaji2Patna2Visakhapatnam2Karnataka2Surat1Telangana1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 1479Section 143(3)4Section 1484Section 143(2)2Reopening of Assessment2

KISHORI CAPITAL MARKETS PVT. LTD.,BBD BAGH (EAST) vs. ITO WARD 2(1), PATNA, LOK NAYAK BHAWAN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 249/PAT/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna06 Nov 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajesh Kumar & Pradip Kumar Choubey

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 14ASection 250

14A of the Act read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The ld. AO has further held that however, this sum is being restricted to the amount of exempt dividend income claimed i.e. Rs. 17,75,205/-. Accordingly, an assessment order was passed at the total income of Rs. 45,55,345/-. Demand notice was issued

RAJEEV RANJAN,NALANDA vs. I.T.O., WARD 2(3), BIHARSHARIF

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 123/PAT/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Patna16 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. N. K. Sainiita No. 123/Pat./2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Rajeev Ranjan, Vs Income Tax Officer, S/O Sita Ram Singh, Garhpar, Ward-2(3), Bihar Sharif, Nalanda-803101 Bihar Sharif (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Agcpr5450R Assessee By : Sh. A. K. Rastogi & Sh. Rakesh Kumar, Advs. Revenue By : Sh. Abhay Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 14.03.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 16 .03.2018 Order This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 30.06.2017 Of Ld. Cit(A)-1, Patna.

For Appellant: Sh. A. K. Rastogi &For Respondent: Sh. Abhay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234B

14A of the Act.” 10. From the aforesaid reasons recorded, it is clear that the AO initiated the proceedings u/s 147 of the Act only on the basis of the assessment records wherein it was mentioned that the assessee had purchased land. Now question arises as to whether that issue was examined by the AO during the course of original