BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 271Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai32Rajkot21Delhi21Pune15Ahmedabad15Jaipur14Amritsar10Nagpur9Surat8Hyderabad7Patna6Raipur5Indore5Cuttack4Bangalore3Lucknow3Chandigarh3Chennai2Guwahati2Jabalpur2Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 14715Section 2508Section 1486Section 115B5Section 142(1)4Section 271F4Cash Deposit4Penalty4Reassessment4Addition to Income

ZAIMUR RAHMAN,EAST CHAMPARAN vs. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 321/PAT/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna07 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115BSection 144BSection 147Section 148Section 149Section 250Section 68Section 69A

Section 271F of the Act for non filing of ITR. 16. For that the ld. assessing officer has erred in not providing the appellant the reason recorded for initiation of reassessment

4
Natural Justice4
Limitation/Time-bar4

MAHANT PANDEY,ROHTAS vs. NFAC, DELHI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 182/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271ASection 271FSection 272A(1)(d)

271F of the Act is also initiated for failure to furnish the return of income I. That it is prayed that as the order is not passed on merits hence, demand may be stayed. That no cash is being deposited all the amount credited in accounts is departmental advance to carry our work, cash withdrawn is for carry out departmental

MAHANT PANDEY,ROHTAS vs. NFAC, DELHI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 181/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271ASection 271FSection 272A(1)(d)

271F of the Act is also initiated for failure to furnish the return of income I. That it is prayed that as the order is not passed on merits hence, demand may be stayed. That no cash is being deposited all the amount credited in accounts is departmental advance to carry our work, cash withdrawn is for carry out departmental

PAVAN KUMAR BHAGAT,SAHARSA vs. ITO, WARD-3(4), SAHARSA, SAHARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 281/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 37Section 69A

reassessment proceeding under Section 147 of the Act and has grossly acted in violation of the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd vs ITO reported in [2002] 125 Taxman 963 (SC) and [2003] 259 ITR 19 (SC). 10. For that the Ld. Assessing officer has erred not serving any notice

RANJEET KUMAR (INDIVIDUAL),BEGUSARAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 2 (1), BEGUSARAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 198/PAT/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna06 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115BSection 144BSection 147Section 148Section 250Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271FSection 282Section 69

reassessment were void ab initio as the section 148 notices were not issued through NFAC and instead by the Ld. JAO, which is in violation of section 144B of the Act. 11. For that the whole order is bad in fact and law of the case and is fit to be set aside and restored back

RAJESH KUMAR,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD- 3 (2), GAYA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 171/PAT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna18 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115BSection 147Section 234ASection 250Section 271FSection 69A

271F amounting to Rs.10,000/- is wrong, illegal and unjustified on the fact and in the circumstances of the appellants. 6. For that the Ld. CIT(A) NFAC Delhi has erred sustaining of invoking section 115BBE in respect of taxed of Rs.1,86,61,540/- is wrong, illegal and unjustified on the fact and in the circumstances of the appellants