BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai174Delhi107Bangalore61Ahmedabad44Hyderabad34Jaipur21Raipur21Surat19Rajkot15Kolkata14Chennai13Dehradun9Pune6Patna3Guwahati3Chandigarh3Indore2Nagpur1Cuttack1Lucknow1Ranchi1SC1Amritsar1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 14716Section 143(3)4Section 1443Addition to Income3Section 250(6)2Section 7472Section 145(3)2Section 402Deduction2Disallowance

ARUN CONSTRUCTION,BHAGALPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, BHAGALPUR

In the result, all the appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 314/PAT/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Aug 2022AY 2009-10
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 145(3)Section 147Section 250(6)Section 40Section 747

234D and 244A is arbitrary and unjustified. The interest component as included in the demand notice is fit to be deleted. ITA No.314 to316/Pat/18 AY 2009-10 Arun Construction Page 4 4. For that the appellant reserves its right to file detailed submission at the time of hearing. 5. For that the appellant craves leave to urge, add or alter

ARUN CONSTRUCTION,BHAGALPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, BHAGALPUR

2

In the result, all the appeals (ITA Nos

ITA 315/PAT/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Aug 2022AY 2009-10
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 145(3)Section 147Section 250(6)Section 40Section 747

234D and 244A is arbitrary and unjustified. The interest component as included in the demand notice is fit to be deleted. ITA No.314 to316/Pat/18 AY 2009-10 Arun Construction Page 4 4. For that the appellant reserves its right to file detailed submission at the time of hearing. 5. For that the appellant craves leave to urge, add or alter

RAJEEV RANJAN,NALANDA vs. I.T.O., WARD 2(3), BIHARSHARIF

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 123/PAT/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Patna16 Mar 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. N. K. Sainiita No. 123/Pat./2017 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Rajeev Ranjan, Vs Income Tax Officer, S/O Sita Ram Singh, Garhpar, Ward-2(3), Bihar Sharif, Nalanda-803101 Bihar Sharif (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Agcpr5450R Assessee By : Sh. A. K. Rastogi & Sh. Rakesh Kumar, Advs. Revenue By : Sh. Abhay Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 14.03.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 16 .03.2018 Order This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 30.06.2017 Of Ld. Cit(A)-1, Patna.

For Appellant: Sh. A. K. Rastogi &For Respondent: Sh. Abhay Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234B

234D amounting to Rs.31,524/- and Rs.19,832/- are wrong, illegal and unjustified on the facts and in the circumstances of the appellant’s case. 9. For that the whole order is bad in fact and law of the case and is fit to be annulled. 10. For that other grounds, if any, shall be urged at the time