BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “reassessment”+ Section 125clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi582Mumbai509Bangalore188Ahmedabad131Chennai130Jaipur110Chandigarh79Kolkata61Hyderabad55Indore52Raipur47Telangana37Surat30Guwahati29Agra27Pune26Amritsar25Lucknow25Rajkot20Allahabad20Nagpur20Visakhapatnam16Jodhpur14Cochin14Cuttack14Ranchi13SC9Dehradun8Patna7Calcutta4Orissa4Karnataka3Rajasthan2Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 25010Section 1489Section 1478Section 1445Section 115B4Section 2634Addition to Income4Condonation of Delay4Section 403Cash Deposit

MANOJ KUMAR DAS,BEGUSARAI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 391/PAT/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: 19/07/2025. The Appeal Is Delayed By Around 37 Days. 4. That The Assessee States That The Reason For Delay Is That The Assessee Is Suffering From Hiv Aids & Is Constantly Under Treatment. Copy Of Medical Treatment Is Enclosed.

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

reassessment proceeding under Section 147 of the Act and has grossly acted in violation of the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd vs ITO reported in [2002] 125

3
Reassessment3
Section 682

PAVAN KUMAR BHAGAT,SAHARSA vs. ITO, WARD-3(4), SAHARSA, SAHARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 281/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115BSection 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 37Section 69A

reassessment proceeding under Section 147 of the Act and has grossly acted in violation of the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd vs ITO reported in [2002] 125

ZAIMUR RAHMAN,EAST CHAMPARAN vs. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 321/PAT/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna07 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115BSection 144BSection 147Section 148Section 149Section 250Section 68Section 69A

reassessment proceeding under Section 147 of the Act and has grossly acted in violation of the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd vs ITO reported in [2002] 125

PAWAN KUMAR, PROP. LIFE LINE RICE MILLS ,BEGUSARAI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), , BEGUSARAI

In the result, these two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 15/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna01 Jan 2025AY 2013-14
Section 144Section 145Section 148Section 250

reassessment. 4. For that the learned assessing officer has erred in passing an order of assessment ex parte to the best of his judgement under section 144 of the Act notwithstanding the fact that the notice issued for the purposes of assessment were not complied with only for want of service. 5. For that the learned assessing officer has erred

PAWAN KUMAR, PROP. LIFE LINE RICE MILLS ,BEGUSARAI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), , BEGUSARAI

In the result, these two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

ITA 14/PAT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna01 Jan 2025AY 2012-13
Section 144Section 145Section 148Section 250

reassessment. 4. For that the learned assessing officer has erred in passing an order of assessment ex parte to the best of his judgement under section 144 of the Act notwithstanding the fact that the notice issued for the purposes of assessment were not complied with only for want of service. 5. For that the learned assessing officer has erred

ITO, WARD-2(1), PATNA vs. M/S SUN COMTECH PVT LTD, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 108/PAT/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jun 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceeding. The assessee relied upon the judicial pronouncements in the case of Income-tax Officer vs. Lakhmani Mewal Das [1976] 103 ITR 437 (SC)[30-03-1976] which has been extracted in the appeal order and also in the cases of Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Kelvinator of India Ltd. [2002] 123 Taxman 433 (Delhi

DEEPAK SHRAWAN BUDHIA,MUMBAI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF I.T., PATNA-1, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 365/PAT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna19 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member)

Section 147Section 263Section 40

125, Bhawani Plaza, Bhawani Income Tax, Patna-1 Shankar Road, Dadar West, Mumbai - 400028 [PAN: ABPPB7393F] APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by Sh. Vikas Chhapolika, CA : Revenue by Md. A H Chowdhury, CIT (DR) : Date of hearing : 14.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 19.01.2026 O R D E R PER LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER This is an appeal filed by the assessee against