BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 35(1)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi876Mumbai710Jaipur249Bangalore221Ahmedabad175Karnataka125Indore118Chennai90Hyderabad87Chandigarh74Kolkata70Raipur60Pune57Lucknow36Calcutta35Surat34Visakhapatnam31Rajkot29Amritsar25Agra17Cuttack14Kerala14Allahabad11Panaji10Dehradun10Cochin10Nagpur9Guwahati7Patna7Ranchi6SC6Telangana3Jodhpur1Rajasthan1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)24Section 271A24Penalty7Addition to Income7Section 1326Search & Seizure6Natural Justice6

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 53/PAT/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

35,358/-. In compliance to the said order the assessee immediately paid a sum of ₹3,78,94,711/-, but the balance amount of ₹2,72,40,647/- could not be paid on account of shortage of funds and other bonafide reasons. For the short payment by the assessee, the learned ITSC took cognizance and withdrew the immunity granted

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 56/PAT/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

35,358/-. In compliance to the said order the assessee immediately paid a sum of ₹3,78,94,711/-, but the balance amount of ₹2,72,40,647/- could not be paid on account of shortage of funds and other bonafide reasons. For the short payment by the assessee, the learned ITSC took cognizance and withdrew the immunity granted

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 55/PAT/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

35,358/-. In compliance to the said order the assessee immediately paid a sum of ₹3,78,94,711/-, but the balance amount of ₹2,72,40,647/- could not be paid on account of shortage of funds and other bonafide reasons. For the short payment by the assessee, the learned ITSC took cognizance and withdrew the immunity granted

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 54/PAT/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

35,358/-. In compliance to the said order the assessee immediately paid a sum of ₹3,78,94,711/-, but the balance amount of ₹2,72,40,647/- could not be paid on account of shortage of funds and other bonafide reasons. For the short payment by the assessee, the learned ITSC took cognizance and withdrew the immunity granted

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LTD,PATNA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 52/PAT/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

35,358/-. In compliance to the said order the assessee immediately paid a sum of ₹3,78,94,711/-, but the balance amount of ₹2,72,40,647/- could not be paid on account of shortage of funds and other bonafide reasons. For the short payment by the assessee, the learned ITSC took cognizance and withdrew the immunity granted

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 57/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

35,358/-. In compliance to the said order the assessee immediately paid a sum of ₹3,78,94,711/-, but the balance amount of ₹2,72,40,647/- could not be paid on account of shortage of funds and other bonafide reasons. For the short payment by the assessee, the learned ITSC took cognizance and withdrew the immunity granted

I.T.O. vs. M/S KUMAR CONSTRUCLTION,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 10/PAT/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 40A(3)

penalty under section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance of the notices at the end of the assessee. Ultimately the ld. Assessing Officer gone through the books of account submitted before her and made these two additions by recording the following finding:- “Addition u/s 40A(3) for payments exceeding Rs.20,000/- through bearer cheques:- On perusal of Books