BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 292Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai79Delhi66Bangalore40Chandigarh16Rajkot10Pune10Jaipur9Kolkata9Chennai8Nagpur6Jabalpur5Indore3Visakhapatnam2Ahmedabad2Amritsar2Cochin2Hyderabad2Lucknow2Patna2SC1Surat1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 271A6Section 153A5Section 271(1)(c)4Section 2502Section 2742Section 132(1)2Section 133A2Penalty2Addition to Income2

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. SUBHASH PD. YADAV, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 97/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132(1)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 275

section 271(l)(c) o the Act can be invoked only for the concealment of income or for filing inadequate particulars. The assessment orders passed clearly revealed that Assessing Officer has neither mentioned about the filing of inadequate particulars nor detected any concealment of income and simply accepted the total income disclosed by the appellant. In this group of case

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA vs. SHRI DUDHESHWAR NATH SINGH, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 15/PAT/2021[1995-96]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Jan 2025AY 1995-96

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A), This Penalty Was Deleted But, As Has Been Pointed Out By The Ld. Ar, The Impugned Order Is Passed In The Name Of Dudheshwar Nath Singh, Sunil Bhawan, Punai Chak, Patna – 800023 (Status Of “Individual”).

Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 273Section 274Section 292BSection 69A

section 271(1)(c) of the 1.T. Act by holding that issue of notice u/s 271(1)(c) by not specifying the nature of default i.e. penalty proceedings are being initiated for furnishing of inaccurate particulars or for concealment of income makes the penalty order liable to be cancelled. In deciding the issue the Ld. CIT(A) has failed