BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 273clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi274Mumbai227Karnataka122Bangalore102Jaipur91Indore79Ahmedabad51Chennai34Lucknow30Kolkata26Hyderabad23Pune18Visakhapatnam17Kerala14Cochin12Chandigarh12Agra8Surat8Amritsar7Rajkot6Panaji5Nagpur4Raipur4Cuttack3Patna2SC2Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Guwahati1Telangana1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 2749Section 271(1)(c)7Section 2713Section 2502Penalty2

JOANNA GOKAVI,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-1, MOTIHARI

Appeal is allowed

ITA 218/PAT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna16 Sept 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara, Hon’Ble Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon’Ble Am Assessment Year:2012-13 बनाम Dr. (Mrs.) Joanna Gokavi Ito, Ward – 1, Motihari / B-19, Anand Niketan, New V/S. Delhi – 110021. Pan No.Amepg 2067 M अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent .. अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/By Appellant None ""यथ" क" ओर से/By Respondent Shri Ajay Kumar, Addl. Cit, Sr. Dr

Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

273/- u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. It emerges from the relevant penalty notice dated 21.10.2014 that the Assessing Officer did not specify as to whether the assessee is accused of concealment of particulars of any taxable income or it had furnished inaccurate particulars of such Dr. (Mrs.) Joanna Gokavi income. This tribunal’s co-ordinate bench’s decision

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA vs. SHRI DUDHESHWAR NATH SINGH, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 15/PAT/2021[1995-96]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Jan 2025AY 1995-96

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A), This Penalty Was Deleted But, As Has Been Pointed Out By The Ld. Ar, The Impugned Order Is Passed In The Name Of Dudheshwar Nath Singh, Sunil Bhawan, Punai Chak, Patna – 800023 (Status Of “Individual”).

Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 273Section 274Section 292BSection 69A

271(1)(c) by not specifying the nature of default i.e. penalty proceedings are being initiated for furnishing of inaccurate particulars or for concealment of income makes the penalty order liable to be cancelled. In deciding the issue the Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that it was just a clerical error or omission which is protected u/s 292B