BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 270A(2)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai120Delhi75Jaipur56Chennai50Bangalore49Cochin28Pune27Indore26Ahmedabad21Hyderabad21Rajkot16Cuttack15Patna12Agra11Raipur11Surat8Nagpur8Lucknow7Amritsar7Visakhapatnam4Kolkata4Ranchi3Chandigarh3Guwahati2Dehradun2Allahabad2Jodhpur2

Key Topics

Section 270A62Section 153A34Section 271(1)(c)21Penalty12Addition to Income7Survey u/s 133A7Section 271A6Section 139(1)6Section 132

NAND KUMAR PRASAD SAH,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

ITA 172/PAT/2023[2020-21]Status: HeardITAT Patna29 Aug 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri SK Tulsiyan, &For Respondent: Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 270A

270A(2)(A) of the Act and secondly, since, the assessee has fulfilled the conditions of Section 270AA(1)(a) and (b) of the Act, assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty. 09. We will first take up the second fold of argument that the assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty u/s 270AA of the Act and that case

6
Section 143(3)6
Search & Seizure6
Natural Justice6

BISHWANATH PRASAD,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

ITA 163/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Patna29 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri SK Tulsiyan, &For Respondent: Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 270A

270A(2)(A) of the Act and secondly, since, the assessee has fulfilled the conditions of Section 270AA(1)(a) and (b) of the Act, assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty. 09. We will first take up the second fold of argument that the assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty u/s 270AA of the Act and that case

BISHWANATH PRASAD,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

ITA 164/PAT/2023[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Patna29 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri SK Tulsiyan, &For Respondent: Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 270A

270A(2)(A) of the Act and secondly, since, the assessee has fulfilled the conditions of Section 270AA(1)(a) and (b) of the Act, assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty. 09. We will first take up the second fold of argument that the assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty u/s 270AA of the Act and that case

BISHWANATH PRASAD,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

ITA 165/PAT/2023[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Patna29 Aug 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri SK Tulsiyan, &For Respondent: Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 270A

270A(2)(A) of the Act and secondly, since, the assessee has fulfilled the conditions of Section 270AA(1)(a) and (b) of the Act, assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty. 09. We will first take up the second fold of argument that the assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty u/s 270AA of the Act and that case

BISHWANATH PRASAD,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

ITA 166/PAT/2023[2020-21]Status: HeardITAT Patna29 Aug 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri SK Tulsiyan, &For Respondent: Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 270A

270A(2)(A) of the Act and secondly, since, the assessee has fulfilled the conditions of Section 270AA(1)(a) and (b) of the Act, assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty. 09. We will first take up the second fold of argument that the assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty u/s 270AA of the Act and that case

NAND KUMAR PRASAD SAH,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

ITA 170/PAT/2023[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Patna29 Aug 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

For Appellant: Shri SK Tulsiyan, &For Respondent: Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 270A

270A(2)(A) of the Act and secondly, since, the assessee has fulfilled the conditions of Section 270AA(1)(a) and (b) of the Act, assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty. 09. We will first take up the second fold of argument that the assessee deserves immunity from imposition of penalty u/s 270AA of the Act and that case

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. SUBHASH PD. YADAV, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 97/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132(1)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 275

271(l)(c) of the Act and subsequently modifying such notice u/s 271AAB(1A) of the I.T. Act. In view of the above penalty orders passed u/s 271AAB(1A) are hereby quashed and accordingly the penalty imposed is deleted. 3.2. In the result, the appeal is allowed”. 7. The ld. CIT(DR) relied upon the order of the ld. Assessing

UMA KANT SINGH,PURNEA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 148/PAT/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee did not appear in response to the single notice fixing the date for hearing and is seen to have not filed any submission also in response to the said notice. Thereafter, the Ld. CIT(A) proceeded ahead to confirm the penalty levied by the Ld. AO. We find an identical pattern in other appeals also of a single notice being issued by the Ld. CIT(A) for which there was seen to be no response from the side of the assessee and thereafter, the penalty imposed in all the

Section 153ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty either u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”) or section 270A of the Act. Since, 2

UMA KANT SINGH,PURNEA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 150/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee did not appear in response to the single notice fixing the date for hearing and is seen to have not filed any submission also in response to the said notice. Thereafter, the Ld. CIT(A) proceeded ahead to confirm the penalty levied by the Ld. AO. We find an identical pattern in other appeals also of a single notice being issued by the Ld. CIT(A) for which there was seen to be no response from the side of the assessee and thereafter, the penalty imposed in all the

Section 153ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty either u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”) or section 270A of the Act. Since, 2

UMA KANT SINGH,PURNEA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 149/PAT/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee did not appear in response to the single notice fixing the date for hearing and is seen to have not filed any submission also in response to the said notice. Thereafter, the Ld. CIT(A) proceeded ahead to confirm the penalty levied by the Ld. AO. We find an identical pattern in other appeals also of a single notice being issued by the Ld. CIT(A) for which there was seen to be no response from the side of the assessee and thereafter, the penalty imposed in all the

Section 153ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty either u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”) or section 270A of the Act. Since, 2

UMA KANT SINGH,PURNEA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 151/PAT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee did not appear in response to the single notice fixing the date for hearing and is seen to have not filed any submission also in response to the said notice. Thereafter, the Ld. CIT(A) proceeded ahead to confirm the penalty levied by the Ld. AO. We find an identical pattern in other appeals also of a single notice being issued by the Ld. CIT(A) for which there was seen to be no response from the side of the assessee and thereafter, the penalty imposed in all the

Section 153ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty either u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”) or section 270A of the Act. Since, 2

UMA KANT SINGH,PURNEA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 152/PAT/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Jul 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee did not appear in response to the single notice fixing the date for hearing and is seen to have not filed any submission also in response to the said notice. Thereafter, the Ld. CIT(A) proceeded ahead to confirm the penalty levied by the Ld. AO. We find an identical pattern in other appeals also of a single notice being issued by the Ld. CIT(A) for which there was seen to be no response from the side of the assessee and thereafter, the penalty imposed in all the

Section 153ASection 270ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty either u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”) or section 270A of the Act. Since, 2