Search: penalty u/s 271

11 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 27(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14815 Section 69C12 Addition to Income10 Section 142(1)9 Section 1479 Penalty9 Section 143(2)7 Section 2506 Section 1446

MERIDIAN CONSTRUCTION INDIA LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-2, PATNA

The appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 261/PAT/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 148Section 271(1)(b)Section 69CSection 70

penalty for not responding to his notice under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. 5. The ld. Assessing Officer has ultimately taken up the assessment proceeding ex parte according to his best judgment provided under section 144 of the Income Tax Act. The ld. Assessing Officer has confronted the assessee Assessment Years

MERIDIAN CONSTRUCTION INDIA LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-2, PATNA

MERIDIAN CONSTRUCTION INDIA LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT CIRCLE-2, PATNA

MERIDIAN CONSTRUCTION INDIA LIMITED,PATNA BIHAR vs. ACIT CIRCLE-2 PATNA, PATNA

MERIDIAN CONSTRUCTION INDIA LIMITED,PATNA, BIHAR vs. ACIT CIRCLE-2 PATNA, PATNA

MERIDIAN CONSTRUCTION INDIA LIMITED,PATNA BIHAR vs. ACIT CIRCLE-2 PATNA, PATNA

I.T.O. vs. M/S KUMAR CONSTRUCLTION,

JITENDRA KUMAR RAY,LALGANJ, HAJIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(3) VAISHALI, HAJIPUR

BAIJU ROY,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-4(2), PATNA

RUBAN PATLIPUTRA HOSPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED,PATNA vs. CIT, PATNA

VINOD PANDEY,SHIV SAGAR, ROHTAS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD SASARAM

VINOD PANDEY,SHIV SAGAR, ROHTAS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SASARAM

SURYADEO PRASAD,SIWAN vs. ITO WARD-2 (3), SIWAN