Search: penalty u/s 271

11 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 251clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)25 Section 271A24 Section 1449 Penalty9 Addition to Income9 Section 2507 Section 69A6 Section 1326 Search & Seizure

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 57/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR

Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

251(2) of the Income tax Act, before enhancing the penalty leviable @ 300%. The assessee has relied upon following case laws: Meetu Bansal Vs. DCIT (Uttarakhand High Court) Syed Maqsoodulla Vs. ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Syed Maqsoodulla Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) of CIT vs. Rai Bahadur Hardutroy Motilal Chamaria [1967] 66 ITR 443 (SC) 010. As regards the penalty u/s 271AAA

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LTD,PATNA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LTD,PATNA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

SURYADEO PRASAD,SIWAN vs. ITO WARD-2 (3), SIWAN

AMRENDRA PRATAP SINGH,VARANASI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 3(1), GAYA

I.T.O. vs. M/S KUMAR CONSTRUCLTION,

M/S MARUTI NANDAN FOOD PRODUCTS PVT LTD,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD- 2(1), PATNA

SHARDINDU PRASAD SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-6(4), PATNA