BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 183clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi131Mumbai80Raipur52Bangalore25Allahabad23Hyderabad22Indore21Rajkot19Pune18Jaipur17Chandigarh15Chennai12Ahmedabad11Kolkata11Nagpur6Lucknow6Patna6Dehradun4Amritsar2Cuttack2Surat2Visakhapatnam1Varanasi1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)24Section 271A24Section 1326Penalty6Addition to Income6Search & Seizure6Natural Justice6

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LTD,PATNA vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 52/PAT/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

183 TAXMAN 100 (DELHI)] held as under: - “in this case it was held that "an assessment order should contain at least a direction for initiation of penalty proceedings to constitute satisfaction of the AO for initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c). Even post Section 271(18), still a prima facie satisfaction of Assessing Officer that the case

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 53/PAT/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

183 TAXMAN 100 (DELHI)] held as under: - “in this case it was held that "an assessment order should contain at least a direction for initiation of penalty proceedings to constitute satisfaction of the AO for initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c). Even post Section 271(18), still a prima facie satisfaction of Assessing Officer that the case

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 54/PAT/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

183 TAXMAN 100 (DELHI)] held as under: - “in this case it was held that "an assessment order should contain at least a direction for initiation of penalty proceedings to constitute satisfaction of the AO for initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c). Even post Section 271(18), still a prima facie satisfaction of Assessing Officer that the case

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 55/PAT/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

183 TAXMAN 100 (DELHI)] held as under: - “in this case it was held that "an assessment order should contain at least a direction for initiation of penalty proceedings to constitute satisfaction of the AO for initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c). Even post Section 271(18), still a prima facie satisfaction of Assessing Officer that the case

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 56/PAT/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

183 TAXMAN 100 (DELHI)] held as under: - “in this case it was held that "an assessment order should contain at least a direction for initiation of penalty proceedings to constitute satisfaction of the AO for initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c). Even post Section 271(18), still a prima facie satisfaction of Assessing Officer that the case

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

ITA 57/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kr. Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Section 132Section 271(1)(c)Section 271A

183 TAXMAN 100 (DELHI)] held as under: - “in this case it was held that "an assessment order should contain at least a direction for initiation of penalty proceedings to constitute satisfaction of the AO for initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c). Even post Section 271(18), still a prima facie satisfaction of Assessing Officer that the case