Search: penalty u/s 271

15 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 16clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)20 Section 27417 Section 271A11 Penalty11 Section 25010 Section 1479 Section 1449 Addition to Income8 Section 2717

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. SUBHASH PD. YADAV, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 97/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna02 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 132(1)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 275

section 275 of the Act, the undersigned is constrained to impose penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) of the Act on the assessee for the said year for the said default. Computation of Penalty u/s 271AAB(1A) is as under:- Assessed income : RS. 4,74,85,650/- 1. Returned income filed by the assessee Rs. 9,85,650/- 2. Additional disclosure

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. SUBHASH PD. YADAV, PATNA

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. SUBHASH PD. YADAV, PATNA

RAINBOW PRODUCTS PVT LTD,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, PATNA

M/S VATSA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, PATNA

SANJAY KUMAR MODI,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

JOANNA GOKAVI,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-1, MOTIHARI

RANJEET KUMAR (INDIVIDUAL),BEGUSARAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 2 (1), BEGUSARAI

ZAIMUR RAHMAN,EAST CHAMPARAN vs. INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, NFAC, DELHI

AMRENDRA PRATAP SINGH,VARANASI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 3(1), GAYA

MANOJ KUMAR DAS,BEGUSARAI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

I.T.O. vs. M/S KUMAR CONSTRUCLTION,

VEENA MISHRA THROUGH NITISH MISHRA,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENT.CIR-1, PATNA, PATNA

SHARDINDU PRASAD SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-6(4), PATNA

M/S MARUTI NANDAN FOOD PRODUCTS PVT LTD,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD- 2(1), PATNA

RUBAN PATLIPUTRA HOSPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED,PATNA vs. CIT, PATNA

ANIL KUMAR SAH,BANKA vs. ITO, WD-1(4), BHAGALPUR, BHAGALPUR