BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 153C(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi218Mumbai192Chennai79Jaipur71Bangalore59Allahabad37Ahmedabad34Pune34Surat33Hyderabad29Rajkot21Chandigarh18Indore18Panaji10Nagpur8Lucknow8Amritsar7Patna7Dehradun7Visakhapatnam5Guwahati5Kolkata5Raipur5Agra2Cochin2Jabalpur2Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)18Section 153D12Section 153C10Section 142(1)7Addition to Income7Section 143(2)4Section 132(1)3Section 133A3Section 153A

SHREE MANGALAM ALUMINIUM,PATNA vs. DC/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 486/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. Nos. 486 To 488/Pat/2022 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 To 2016-2017 Shree Mangalam Aluminium,…...….………Appellant Pandey Plaza Building, Exhibition Road, Patna-800001, Bihar [Pan:Abkfs3963M] -Vs.- Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,……………………………………………………..Respondent Central Circle-3, Patna, Bihar

Section 106Section 132Section 132(1)Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 271(1)(c)

153C of the Act declaring total income of Rs.2,54,100/- for A.Y.2014-2015, Rs.4,19,890/- for A.Y.2015- 2016 and return of income u/s. 142(1) of the Act was filed declaring total income at Rs.4,89,730/- for A.Y.2016-2017. Consequently, the Assessing Officer framed the assessment u/s.153A of the Act for A.Y.2014-2015 & 2015-2016 and u/s

3
Penalty3
Search & Seizure3
Survey u/s 133A3

SHREE MANGALAM ALUMINIUM,PATNA vs. DC/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 488/PAT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. Nos. 486 To 488/Pat/2022 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 To 2016-2017 Shree Mangalam Aluminium,…...….………Appellant Pandey Plaza Building, Exhibition Road, Patna-800001, Bihar [Pan:Abkfs3963M] -Vs.- Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,……………………………………………………..Respondent Central Circle-3, Patna, Bihar

Section 106Section 132Section 132(1)Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 271(1)(c)

153C of the Act declaring total income of Rs.2,54,100/- for A.Y.2014-2015, Rs.4,19,890/- for A.Y.2015- 2016 and return of income u/s. 142(1) of the Act was filed declaring total income at Rs.4,89,730/- for A.Y.2016-2017. Consequently, the Assessing Officer framed the assessment u/s.153A of the Act for A.Y.2014-2015 & 2015-2016 and u/s

SHREE MANGALAM ALUMINIUM,PATNA vs. DC/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 487/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. Nos. 486 To 488/Pat/2022 Assessment Year: 2014-2015 To 2016-2017 Shree Mangalam Aluminium,…...….………Appellant Pandey Plaza Building, Exhibition Road, Patna-800001, Bihar [Pan:Abkfs3963M] -Vs.- Deputy/Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,……………………………………………………..Respondent Central Circle-3, Patna, Bihar

Section 106Section 132Section 132(1)Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 271(1)(c)

153C of the Act declaring total income of Rs.2,54,100/- for A.Y.2014-2015, Rs.4,19,890/- for A.Y.2015- 2016 and return of income u/s. 142(1) of the Act was filed declaring total income at Rs.4,89,730/- for A.Y.2016-2017. Consequently, the Assessing Officer framed the assessment u/s.153A of the Act for A.Y.2014-2015 & 2015-2016 and u/s

SMT. ANITA DEVI,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 21/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 Jul 2025AY 2015-16
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 153D

153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is bad in law.\"\nPage 2\nITA Nos. 17 to 22/PAT/2022\nSmt. Anita Devi; A.Ys. 2011-12 to 2016-17\n03. The Id. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the issues raised in\nthe additional ground are purely legal issue. The Id. AR further\nsubmitted that no verification of facts is required

SMT. ANITA DEVI,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 19/PAT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 Jul 2025AY 2013-14
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 153D

153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is bad in law.”\nPage 2\nITA Nos. 17 to 22/PAT/2022\nSmt. Anita Devi; A.Ys. 2011-12 to 2016-17\n03. The Id. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the issues raised in\nthe additional ground are purely legal issue. The Id. AR further\nsubmitted that no verification of facts is required

SMT. ANITA DEVI,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 20/PAT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 Jul 2025AY 2014-15
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 153D

153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is bad in law.”\nPage 2\nITA Nos. 17 to 22/PAT/2022\nSmt. Anita Devi; A.Ys. 2011-12 to 2016-17\n03. The Id. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the issues raised in\nthe additional ground are purely legal issue. The Id. AR further\nsubmitted that no verification of facts is required

SMT. ANITA DEVI,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 18/PAT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 Jul 2025AY 2012-13
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 153D

153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is bad in law.”\nPage 2\nITA Nos. 17 to 22/PAT/2022\nSmt. Anita Devi; A.Ys. 2011-12 to 2016-17\n03. The Id. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the issues raised in\nthe additional ground are purely legal issue. The Id. AR further\nsubmitted that no verification of facts is required