PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

271 shall be imposed upon the assessee in respect of the undisclosed income referred to in sub-section (1). (4)The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, so far as may be, apply in relation to the penalty referred to in this section. Explanation. - For the purposes of this section,- (a)"undisclosed income" means- (i)any income

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

271 shall be imposed upon the assessee in respect of the undisclosed income referred to in sub-section (1). (4)The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, so far as may be, apply in relation to the penalty referred to in this section. Explanation. - For the purposes of this section,- (a)"undisclosed income" means- (i)any income

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

271 shall be imposed upon the assessee in respect of the undisclosed income referred to in sub-section (1). (4)The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, so far as may be, apply in relation to the penalty referred to in this section. Explanation. - For the purposes of this section,- (a)"undisclosed income" means- (i)any income

PATLIPUTRA BUILDERS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, PATNA

In the result, all the captioned appeals of the assessee for A

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Am & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Jm

271 shall be imposed upon the assessee in respect of the undisclosed income referred to in sub-section (1). (4)The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, so far as may be, apply in relation to the penalty referred to in this section. Explanation. - For the purposes of this section,- (a)"undisclosed income" means- (i)any income

ASHOKA TUBEWELL BORING ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CC-2, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained. The return filed under Section 153A is to be treated as a return under Section 139, and concealment must be judged against this return.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "271(1)(c)", "132(1)", "153A", "132(4)", "68" ], "issues": "Whether the penalty

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. SUBHASH PD. YADAV, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

153A of the Act. Therefore, no occasion for Assessing Officer arises to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(l)(c) for concealment of income. Appellant has disclosed total income voluntarily and during the course of assessment proceedings Assessing Officer could not deviate from the same. Several Jurisdictional Pronouncement have established that the provisions of the section

BISHWANATH PRASAD,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

271/-. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) read with section 153A of the Act on 13th March, 2022, and returned income was accepted. Hon'ble Courts have held time and again that once the assessee furnishes income tax return u/s 153A of the Act, and the same is accepted by the learned Assessing Officer for the purpose of carrying

BISHWANATH PRASAD,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

271/-. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) read with section 153A of the Act on 13th March, 2022, and returned income was accepted. Hon'ble Courts have held time and again that once the assessee furnishes income tax return u/s 153A of the Act, and the same is accepted by the learned Assessing Officer for the purpose of carrying

BISHWANATH PRASAD,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

271/-. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) read with section 153A of the Act on 13th March, 2022, and returned income was accepted. Hon'ble Courts have held time and again that once the assessee furnishes income tax return u/s 153A of the Act, and the same is accepted by the learned Assessing Officer for the purpose of carrying

NAND KUMAR PRASAD SAH,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

271/-. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) read with section 153A of the Act on 13th March, 2022, and returned income was accepted. Hon'ble Courts have held time and again that once the assessee furnishes income tax return u/s 153A of the Act, and the same is accepted by the learned Assessing Officer for the purpose of carrying

NAND KUMAR PRASAD SAH,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

271/-. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) read with section 153A of the Act on 13th March, 2022, and returned income was accepted. Hon'ble Courts have held time and again that once the assessee furnishes income tax return u/s 153A of the Act, and the same is accepted by the learned Assessing Officer for the purpose of carrying

BISHWANATH PRASAD,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee (s) in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vp & Shri Dr. Manish Borad, Am

271/-. The assessment was completed u/s 143(3) read with section 153A of the Act on 13th March, 2022, and returned income was accepted. Hon'ble Courts have held time and again that once the assessee furnishes income tax return u/s 153A of the Act, and the same is accepted by the learned Assessing Officer for the purpose of carrying

UMA KANT SINGH,PURNEA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee did not appear in response to the single notice fixing the date for hearing and is seen to have not filed any submission also in response to the said notice. Thereafter, the Ld. CIT(A) proceeded ahead to confirm the penalty levied by the Ld. AO. We find an identical pattern in other appeals also of a single notice being issued by the Ld. CIT(A) for which there was seen to be no response from the side of the assessee and thereafter, the penalty imposed in all the

section 270A of the Act. Since, 2 ITA Nos. 148-152/Kol/2023 Uma Kant Singh the issues are inter-connected, these five appeals are being disposed of through a single order. For the sake of convenience, the lead case shall be taken as ITA No. 148/Pat/2023 pertaining to AY 2015-16. 2. In these five cases, the following

UMA KANT SINGH,PURNEA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee did not appear in response to the single notice fixing the date for hearing and is seen to have not filed any submission also in response to the said notice. Thereafter, the Ld. CIT(A) proceeded ahead to confirm the penalty levied by the Ld. AO. We find an identical pattern in other appeals also of a single notice being issued by the Ld. CIT(A) for which there was seen to be no response from the side of the assessee and thereafter, the penalty imposed in all the

section 270A of the Act. Since, 2 ITA Nos. 148-152/Kol/2023 Uma Kant Singh the issues are inter-connected, these five appeals are being disposed of through a single order. For the sake of convenience, the lead case shall be taken as ITA No. 148/Pat/2023 pertaining to AY 2015-16. 2. In these five cases, the following

UMA KANT SINGH,PURNEA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee did not appear in response to the single notice fixing the date for hearing and is seen to have not filed any submission also in response to the said notice. Thereafter, the Ld. CIT(A) proceeded ahead to confirm the penalty levied by the Ld. AO. We find an identical pattern in other appeals also of a single notice being issued by the Ld. CIT(A) for which there was seen to be no response from the side of the assessee and thereafter, the penalty imposed in all the

section 270A of the Act. Since, 2 ITA Nos. 148-152/Kol/2023 Uma Kant Singh the issues are inter-connected, these five appeals are being disposed of through a single order. For the sake of convenience, the lead case shall be taken as ITA No. 148/Pat/2023 pertaining to AY 2015-16. 2. In these five cases, the following

UMA KANT SINGH,PURNEA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee did not appear in response to the single notice fixing the date for hearing and is seen to have not filed any submission also in response to the said notice. Thereafter, the Ld. CIT(A) proceeded ahead to confirm the penalty levied by the Ld. AO. We find an identical pattern in other appeals also of a single notice being issued by the Ld. CIT(A) for which there was seen to be no response from the side of the assessee and thereafter, the penalty imposed in all the

section 270A of the Act. Since, 2 ITA Nos. 148-152/Kol/2023 Uma Kant Singh the issues are inter-connected, these five appeals are being disposed of through a single order. For the sake of convenience, the lead case shall be taken as ITA No. 148/Pat/2023 pertaining to AY 2015-16. 2. In these five cases, the following

UMA KANT SINGH,PURNEA vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee did not appear in response to the single notice fixing the date for hearing and is seen to have not filed any submission also in response to the said notice. Thereafter, the Ld. CIT(A) proceeded ahead to confirm the penalty levied by the Ld. AO. We find an identical pattern in other appeals also of a single notice being issued by the Ld. CIT(A) for which there was seen to be no response from the side of the assessee and thereafter, the penalty imposed in all the

section 270A of the Act. Since, 2 ITA Nos. 148-152/Kol/2023 Uma Kant Singh the issues are inter-connected, these five appeals are being disposed of through a single order. For the sake of convenience, the lead case shall be taken as ITA No. 148/Pat/2023 pertaining to AY 2015-16. 2. In these five cases, the following

GANESH RAM DOKANIA,BANKA vs. ACIT, CIR-2, PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubeyassessment Years: 2014-15 Ganesh Ram Dokania………..……..………………….……….……….……Appellant Dokania Market, Aliganj, Bihar-813102.. [Pan: Aadfg1795P] Vs. Acit, Circle-2, Patna…….………...…………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Manish Rastogi, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. A H Chowdhury, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 17, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 08, 2026 Order Per Pradip Kumar Choubey: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 27.03.2025 Of The Cit(A)-3, Patna (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014–15. 2. Facts In Brief Are That The Assessee Is Engaged In Real Estate Business & The Assessee Filed Return Of Income On 15.11.2016 In Response To Notice U/S 153A Of The Act By Declaring Total Income Of Rs.31,56,350/-. Notice U/S. 143(2) Of The Act Was Issued & Subsequently, Assessment U/S. 153A/144 Was Completed At A Total Income Of Rs.25,67,79,232/- Wherein The Assessing Officer Imposed Penalty U/S. 271Aab Of The Act At Rs. 1,60,00,000/- On Undisclosed Income.

153A of the Act by declaring total income of Rs.31,56,350/-. Notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act was issued and subsequently, assessment u/s. 153A/144 was completed at a total income of Rs.25,67,79,232/- wherein the Assessing Officer imposed penalty u/s. 271AAB of the Act at Rs. 1,60,00,000/- on undisclosed income. 3. Aggrieved