YOGENDRA PRASAD SHARMA,PATNA vs. DC/AC CIRCLE-6, , PATNA
The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 6/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Patna10 Feb 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. No.06/Pat/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Yogendra Prasad Sharma………………………………………..………….……Appellant 0 Matukdhari Niwas, West Boring Canal Road Boring Road, Patna-800001. [Pan: Aoppd7881R] Vs. Dc/Ac, Circle-6, Patna……..……....….….. ……………….........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Sagar Warsi, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit - Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 06, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 10, 2025 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against An Order Dated 30.05.2024 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. At The Outset, The Registry Has Informed That There Is A Delay Of 160 Days In Filing The Present Appeal. The Assessee Filed An Application For Condonation Of Delay Stating Reasons For Such Delay. After Considering The Application, We Find Reasonable Cause & The Delay Was Not Intentional. We, Therefore, Condone The Delay In Filing The Appeal & Adjudicate The Appeal On Merits Of The Case. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is An Individual & Filed His Return Of Income By Declaring Total Income Of Rs.11,32,280/-
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69A
unexplained money u/s 69A of the Act and added the same in the hands of the assessee by framing an assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act.
4. Dissatisfied with the above order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. CIT(A) against the assessment order. However, the ld.
CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee
