BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 72clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi834Mumbai766Bangalore299Jaipur211Hyderabad148Chandigarh132Chennai98Ahmedabad85Kolkata76Cochin66Pune65Raipur58Rajkot58Indore51Nagpur47SC25Guwahati24Surat23Amritsar21Cuttack19Lucknow18Visakhapatnam14Jodhpur7Varanasi5Agra4Patna3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Ranchi1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 2505Addition to Income3Section 1472Section 143(3)2Limitation/Time-bar2Condonation of Delay2Disallowance2

PRABHAT KUMAR,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4, PATNA

Appeal is allowed\nfor statistical purposes

ITA 283/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Feb 2025AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 250

72,34,608 (Actual cost of improvement Rs.12,01,200 X 264/184)\nclaimed by the appellant in its return of income for the purpose of long term capital\ngain and taxing the same as capital gain, notwithstanding the fact that the\nappellant has given sufficient documentary evidences before the Id assessing\nofficer to substantiate the claim of cost of improvement

RAVI LOCHAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 124/PAT/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Jan 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 250Section 32Section 32(1)

housing loan for flat no. 5D, Malayalay. Hence this addition of the AO is confirmed, and the appeal of the assessee is dismissed on this ground. Ground No- 6 regarding disallowance of Rs. 2,98,145/- on account of 50% of interest on loan taken for purchases of property 2W, The Millennium Building. This ground is same nature as ground

MINTU RANI,PATNA vs. ASSESSEMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 16/PAT/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 144Section 147Section 250

property, which is wrong, illegal and unjustified. 5. For that the learned NFAC has erred in the facts and circumstances of the case in confirming the action of the AO in making addition of Rs 72,54,686/- on account of alleged deposits in the bank accounts, which is wrong, illegal and unjustified. 6. For that the learned NFAC