Search: house property

8 results for “house property”+ Section 71clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)16 Section 26314 Section 153A12 Section 142(1)6 Addition to Income6 Section 133A5 Survey u/s 133A5 Section 1324 Charitable Trust4

PRABHAT KUMAR,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4, PATNA

Appeal is allowed\nfor statistical purposes

ITA 283/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna04 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Section 143(3)Section 250

71,950 less net income\nfrom contract shown in ITR at Rs.21,09,967), notwithstanding the fact that the Id\nassessing officer has not rejected the books as section 145(3) of the Act and that\nthe appellant has maintained books of accounts and bill and vouchers for expenses\nas well as most of the expenses\nhave been through banking

YOGENDRA PRASAD SHARMA,PATNA vs. DC/AC CIRCLE-6, , PATNA

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Patna10 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. No.06/Pat/2025 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Yogendra Prasad Sharma………………………………………..………….……Appellant 0 Matukdhari Niwas, West Boring Canal Road Boring Road, Patna-800001. [Pan: Aoppd7881R] Vs. Dc/Ac, Circle-6, Patna……..……....….….. ……………….........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Sagar Warsi, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit - Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 06, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 10, 2025 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against An Order Dated 30.05.2024 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. At The Outset, The Registry Has Informed That There Is A Delay Of 160 Days In Filing The Present Appeal. The Assessee Filed An Application For Condonation Of Delay Stating Reasons For Such Delay. After Considering The Application, We Find Reasonable Cause & The Delay Was Not Intentional. We, Therefore, Condone The Delay In Filing The Appeal & Adjudicate The Appeal On Merits Of The Case. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is An Individual & Filed His Return Of Income By Declaring Total Income Of Rs.11,32,280/-

PRABHAT KUMAR,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4, PATNA

YOGENDRA PRASAD SHARMA,PATNA vs. DC/AC CIRCLE-6, , PATNA

PRABHAT KUMAR,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4, PATNA

YOGENDRA PRASAD SHARMA,PATNA vs. DC/AC CIRCLE-6, , PATNA

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

M/S SATYAM EDUCATIONAL HEALTH & CHARITABLE TRUST,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-CENTRAL, PATNA

SRIRAM ENTERPRISES,PATNA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), PATNA

XAVIERS CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD,PATNA vs. ITO WARD- 2 (2), PATNA