RENU DEVI,PATNA vs. ITO, PATNA
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 672/PAT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Aug 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 672/Pat/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-2017 Renu Devi,……………………………....….………Appellant D/79, P.C. Colony, Lohia Nagar, Kankarbagh, Patna-800020, Bihar [Pan:Algpd4522P] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,………………………...…….Respondent Ward-6(2), Patna Appearances By: Shri Sudipta Sannigrahi, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, Jcit, Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: June 24, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: August 25, 2025 O R D E R
Section 144Section 148Section 2(47)(v)Section 271(1)(c)Section 45Section 48
31,828/- as interest. On being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld.
CIT(Appeals).
3. The Ld. Addl./JCIT(A) dismissed the Appeal of the Assessee simply confirming the order of the ld. Assessing Officer without giving reasoning as to why specific clauses of the JDA which expressly lays down the condition precedent for transfer
