BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “house property”+ Section 163clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi267Mumbai152Bangalore75Chennai71Hyderabad65Jaipur58Chandigarh39Raipur34Lucknow20Indore15Kolkata13Nagpur13Visakhapatnam7Patna7SC7Rajkot6Surat6Agra5Ahmedabad5Cochin4Pune4Allahabad3Jodhpur3Amritsar2Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 26356Section 153A56Section 143(3)14Section 12714Limitation/Time-bar7Revision u/s 2637

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL), PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 322/PAT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

163 ITR 129 (Mad) e) CIT vs. Steller Investment Ltd. (1991) 59 Taxman 568, 569-70 (Del) f) CIT vs. J. P. GOEL (2001) 161 TAXMANN.COM 400 (CAL) Commissioner noticing order passed by the assessing officer prejudicial to the interests of Revenue since the assessing officer had not fully verified the facts – Commissioner noticing that there being a search

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 323/PAT/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

163 ITR 129 (Mad) e) CIT vs. Steller Investment Ltd. (1991) 59 Taxman 568, 569-70 (Del) f) CIT vs. J. P. GOEL (2001) 161 TAXMANN.COM 400 (CAL) Commissioner noticing order passed by the assessing officer prejudicial to the interests of Revenue since the assessing officer had not fully verified the facts – Commissioner noticing that there being a search

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 325/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

163 ITR 129 (Mad) e) CIT vs. Steller Investment Ltd. (1991) 59 Taxman 568, 569-70 (Del) f) CIT vs. J. P. GOEL (2001) 161 TAXMANN.COM 400 (CAL) Commissioner noticing order passed by the assessing officer prejudicial to the interests of Revenue since the assessing officer had not fully verified the facts – Commissioner noticing that there being a search

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 326/PAT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

163 ITR 129 (Mad) e) CIT vs. Steller Investment Ltd. (1991) 59 Taxman 568, 569-70 (Del) f) CIT vs. J. P. GOEL (2001) 161 TAXMANN.COM 400 (CAL) Commissioner noticing order passed by the assessing officer prejudicial to the interests of Revenue since the assessing officer had not fully verified the facts – Commissioner noticing that there being a search

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 327/PAT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

163 ITR 129 (Mad) e) CIT vs. Steller Investment Ltd. (1991) 59 Taxman 568, 569-70 (Del) f) CIT vs. J. P. GOEL (2001) 161 TAXMANN.COM 400 (CAL) Commissioner noticing order passed by the assessing officer prejudicial to the interests of Revenue since the assessing officer had not fully verified the facts – Commissioner noticing that there being a search

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 328/PAT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

163 ITR 129 (Mad) e) CIT vs. Steller Investment Ltd. (1991) 59 Taxman 568, 569-70 (Del) f) CIT vs. J. P. GOEL (2001) 161 TAXMANN.COM 400 (CAL) Commissioner noticing order passed by the assessing officer prejudicial to the interests of Revenue since the assessing officer had not fully verified the facts – Commissioner noticing that there being a search

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 329/PAT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

163 ITR 129 (Mad) e) CIT vs. Steller Investment Ltd. (1991) 59 Taxman 568, 569-70 (Del) f) CIT vs. J. P. GOEL (2001) 161 TAXMANN.COM 400 (CAL) Commissioner noticing order passed by the assessing officer prejudicial to the interests of Revenue since the assessing officer had not fully verified the facts – Commissioner noticing that there being a search