Search: disallowance

9 results for “disallowance”+ Section 46Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 2509 Addition to Income8 Disallowance6 Section 143(3)5 Deduction5 Cash Deposit5 Section 194J4 Section 1444 Section 69A4 Section 147

LAKSHMI MANDAL,MADHUBANI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MADHUBANI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RAKESH MISHRA (Accountant Member)

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 43B

disallowed under section 43B of the Act, and cash deposit of ₹27,48,500/- in the bank account during the year had not been examined by the Assessing Officer. 3. Accordingly, vide order dated 09.02.2022, the Principal CIT set aside the original assessment with a direction to reframe the assessment. In compliance, the Assessing Officer passed a fresh order under

LAKSHMI MANDAL,MADHUBANI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MADHUBANI

PAVAN KUMAR BHAGAT,SAHARSA vs. ITO, WARD-3(4), SAHARSA, SAHARA

LAKSHMI MANDAL,MADHUBANI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MADHUBANI

PAVAN KUMAR BHAGAT,SAHARSA vs. ITO, WARD-3(4), SAHARSA, SAHARA

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, MUZAFFARPUR vs. M/S UTTAR BIHAR GRAMIN BANK, MUZAFFARPUR

BLUECHIP ASSET PRIVATE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS BLUECHIP ADVISORY PVT. LTD,PATNA vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI

GURUDWARA BAL LEELA MAINI SANGAT TRUST,PATNA vs. DC/AC, EXEMPTION, PATNA

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, PATNA, PATNA vs. YASHI FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED, PATNA

RANI DEVI,PATNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PATNA

BRIJESH KUMAR,WEST CHAMPARAN vs. DC/AC CIRCLE-1, MUZAFFARPUR

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. RISHAV DUTTA, PATNA