BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “disallowance”+ Section 36(1)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai327Chennai155Delhi134Bangalore128Cochin92Pune58Kolkata52Hyderabad29Visakhapatnam28Jaipur28Indore23Cuttack23Surat22Amritsar20Chandigarh16Nagpur16Karnataka16Ahmedabad14Rajkot13Jodhpur9Patna9Kerala7Guwahati7Jabalpur5SC4Telangana4Agra3Lucknow3Allahabad2Ranchi1Raipur1Panaji1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(viia)12Section 1478Disallowance7Addition to Income6Section 2505Section 143(3)4Deduction4Natural Justice4Section 363Section 40a

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, MUZAFFARPUR vs. M/S UTTAR BIHAR GRAMIN BANK, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 30/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 250Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(vila)

disallowance of the provisional expenditure as per para 11 of the assessment order at ₹44,70,128/- were made and the total income was assessed at ₹176,92,74,630/-. Aggrieved with the assessment order, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who considered in detail the provisions of section 36(1)(viia

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, MUZAFFARPUR vs. M/S UTTAR BIHAR GRAMIN BANK, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

2
Section 43D2
Section 142(1)2
ITA 29/PAT/2021[2013-14]Status: Disposed
ITAT Patna
26 Mar 2025
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey] I.T.A. No. 29/Pat/2021 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Dcit, Circle-1, Muzaffarpur M/S Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank

Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 36(1)(viiia)

Section 36(1)(viia) and Rule 6ABA. The Ld. Counsel further submits that the scheme of KCC loan is valid for five years subject to annual review and annual review does not 3 I.T.A. No. 29/Pat/2021 Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/s Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank curtail the term of the loan. The Ld. Counsel further submits the CC limit

ACIT, CIRCLE-1, PATNA vs. BIHAR KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK, MUNGER

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 257/PAT/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(viia)

section 36(1)(viia) of the Act and he held that the deduction @10% is allowable on the aggregate average advances of the rural branches computed as per Rule 6ABA of the IT Rules, 1962. The assessee furnished the chart of outstanding advances of the urban and rural branches as per which the total outstanding advances

THE SIWAN CENTRAL CO.-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,SIWAN vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 29/PAT/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 147Section 250Section 36Section 40aSection 43D

section 36(viia) of the I.T. Act whereas the entire bad debt is an allowable deduction. 11. For that the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding addition of Rs.2,88,460/- on the ground that the same is on account of income tax. 12. For that the disallowance of Rs. 1

THE SIWAN CENTRAL CO.-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,SIWAN vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 30/PAT/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 147Section 250Section 36Section 40aSection 43D

section 36(viia) of the I.T. Act whereas the entire bad debt is an allowable deduction. 11. For that the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in upholding addition of Rs.2,88,460/- on the ground that the same is on account of income tax. 12. For that the disallowance of Rs. 1

THE MUZAFFARPUR CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,MUZAFFARPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 87/PAT/2019[12/03/2019]Status: HeardITAT Patna05 Jul 2022

Bench: Shri Mainsh Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 139Section 139(3)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 32(2)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 72

disallowable u/s 36(1)(viia) in earlier years. 15. For that the amount credited to profit & loss account as provisions written back consist of the aid provided by the Central and State Government in lieu of the irrecoverable debt. This amount, though credited in profit & loss account, is actually a capital receipt, not liable to tax under the Income

THE MUZAFFARPUR CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,MUZAFFARPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 88/PAT/2019[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Patna05 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mainsh Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36Section 36(1)(viia)

section 36(1)(viia) of the I.T. Act. The provision for bad and doubtful debts as claimed is profit & loss account is therefore allowable in full. 2 The Muzaffarpur Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. AY 2012-13 6. For that it is humbly prayed that directions may kindly be given for adjustment of determined loss after giving effect of appellate

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), MUZAFFARPUR vs. M/S UTTAR BIHAR GRAMIN BANK, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal of revenue for AY 2009-10 and that of assessee for AY 2012-13 are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 173/PAT/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 Dec 2022AY 2009-10
Section 250Section 36(1)(viia)

disallowance of Rs. 8,41,31,263/- claimed as expenditure under the head amortization of Government Securities. (6) For that expenditure under the head amortization of Government Securities has been claimed as per prudential norms of the RBI and the premium amortized has been claimed to be in respect of securities held under the category 'held to maturity

UTTAR BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,MUZAFFARPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal of revenue for AY 2009-10 and that of assessee for AY 2012-13 are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 52/PAT/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 Dec 2022AY 2012-13
Section 250Section 36(1)(viia)

disallowance of Rs. 8,41,31,263/- claimed as expenditure under the head amortization of Government Securities. (6) For that expenditure under the head amortization of Government Securities has been claimed as per prudential norms of the RBI and the premium amortized has been claimed to be in respect of securities held under the category 'held to maturity