BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 270A(10)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai330Delhi273Ahmedabad95Pune71Jaipur69Bangalore68Hyderabad65Chennai57Chandigarh27Kolkata25Indore22Nagpur18Rajkot17Guwahati16Lucknow16Visakhapatnam15Surat13Raipur13Cochin10Agra9Cuttack9Dehradun8Panaji2Amritsar2Patna2Varanasi2Jodhpur2Ranchi1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 1443Section 54F3Section 2502Section 143(3)2Deduction2Addition to Income2Natural Justice2

RANI DEVI,PATNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 308/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna25 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 250Section 44ASection 69ASection 80C

disallowed the claim of Rs.50,000/- under chapter VIA of the Act on account of non-submission/evidence filed by the assessee. Finally, the ld. Assessing Officer determined the total assessed income of the assessee at Rs.51,39,945/- and initiated penalty proceedings under section 270A of the Act. 6. Aggrieved with the assessment order, the assessee filed an appeal

SEEMA SRIVASTAVA,PATNA vs. ITO,DC/AC-6, PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITA 715/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna06 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 250Section 250(2)Section 48Section 54Section 54F

10. For that the appellant may be given opportunity of personal hearing physically/virtually at the time of hearing of the appeal. 11. For that the whole order is bad in fact and law of the case and is fit to be annulled and/or restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A), NFAC and/or the A.O. 12. For that