BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 253(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,131Delhi716Chennai279Bangalore210Kolkata163Jaipur99Indore98Ahmedabad90Chandigarh82Lucknow62Pune55Surat54Allahabad52Panaji36Cuttack33Hyderabad30Rajkot29Telangana21Amritsar20Ranchi20Raipur18Cochin16Nagpur14Guwahati12Varanasi12Jodhpur11Agra10Patna6SC6Karnataka4Visakhapatnam2Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 2507Section 11(1)6Addition to Income6Disallowance5Section 284Section 253(2)3Section 2(15)3Exemption3Condonation of Delay3Section 250(6)

MOTOR MACHINERUY TOOLS,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 39/PAT/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz)]

Section 250Section 28Section 43(1)

D] Vs. ACIT,Circle-5, Patna………………………………………………………………………………….Respondent Appearances by: Sh. Ajay Kumar Rastogi, Adv., appeared on behalf of the Assessee. Sh. Ajay Kumar, JCIT, Sr.D/R, appeared on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : September 8th, 2021 Date of pronouncing the order : September 9th, 2021 ORDER Per Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-President: This appeal filed by the assessee

RUSHATAM KHAN,PURNEA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, PURNEA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2013-

ITA 328/PAT/2018[2013-14]Status: Heard
2
Section 234A2
Section 271(1)(c)2
ITAT Patna
22 Jul 2022
AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 234ASection 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)

section 271(1)(c) based on the order passed initiated by the Ld. Officer is wholly misconceived, arbitrary, unjustifiable and illegal. 9. For that the CIT (Appeal) erred in passing ex-parte order by not following principal of natural justice and the Ld. assessing officer also erred in passing order by not following principal of natural justice. 10. For that

RUSHATAM KHAN,PURNEA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, PURNEA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2013-

ITA 329/PAT/2018[2014-15]Status: HeardITAT Patna22 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 234ASection 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)

section 271(1)(c) based on the order passed initiated by the Ld. Officer is wholly misconceived, arbitrary, unjustifiable and illegal. 9. For that the CIT (Appeal) erred in passing ex-parte order by not following principal of natural justice and the Ld. assessing officer also erred in passing order by not following principal of natural justice. 10. For that

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 66/PAT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

D E R PER SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: 1. In the present three matters it is seen that there is a delay in filing of appeals which has been requested to be condoned by the Revenue. For the sake of convenience, the application for condonation of delay for AY 2013- 14 is extracted as under: “With reference to the subject

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 67/PAT/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

D E R PER SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: 1. In the present three matters it is seen that there is a delay in filing of appeals which has been requested to be condoned by the Revenue. For the sake of convenience, the application for condonation of delay for AY 2013- 14 is extracted as under: “With reference to the subject

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 65/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

D E R PER SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: 1. In the present three matters it is seen that there is a delay in filing of appeals which has been requested to be condoned by the Revenue. For the sake of convenience, the application for condonation of delay for AY 2013- 14 is extracted as under: “With reference to the subject