BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 253clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,466Delhi967Chennai292Bangalore228Kolkata202Indore123Chandigarh119Jaipur109Ahmedabad96Pune94Surat66Lucknow64Raipur53Allahabad50Hyderabad42Panaji36Amritsar32Rajkot30Cuttack29Telangana25Ranchi20Nagpur17Cochin16Guwahati13Agra12Karnataka12Varanasi12Jodhpur10Patna6SC6Visakhapatnam2Calcutta2Dehradun2Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1Orissa1Uttarakhand1Jabalpur1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 2507Section 11(1)6Addition to Income6Disallowance5Section 284Section 253(2)3Section 2(15)3Exemption3Condonation of Delay3Section 250(6)

RUSHATAM KHAN,PURNEA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, PURNEA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2013-

ITA 328/PAT/2018[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Patna22 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 234ASection 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)

253 i.e 10% of Freight Outward Expenses Rs.1,52,533/- of M/s Khan Brothers discussed, disallowed and added as per Para B of the order passed by Ld. assessing officer in passing order based on adhoc, presumption, surmise, inference and ignoring facts and circumstances of the case. 4. For that the CIT (Appeal) erred in passing ex-parte order confirming

RUSHATAM KHAN,PURNEA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, PURNEA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2013-

ITA 329/PAT/2018[2014-15]Status: Heard
2
Section 234A2
Section 271(1)(c)2
ITAT Patna
22 Jul 2022
AY 2014-15

Bench: Sri Manish Borad & Sri Sonjoy Sarma

Section 234ASection 250(6)Section 271(1)(c)

253 i.e 10% of Freight Outward Expenses Rs.1,52,533/- of M/s Khan Brothers discussed, disallowed and added as per Para B of the order passed by Ld. assessing officer in passing order based on adhoc, presumption, surmise, inference and ignoring facts and circumstances of the case. 4. For that the CIT (Appeal) erred in passing ex-parte order confirming

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 66/PAT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

253(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the said case.” It is seen that the request for condoning the said delays are similarly worded for the remaining two appeals. Hence, based on the reasons given for AY 2013-14, the delay in filing of the appeals is hereby condoned and these three matters are admitted for adjudication

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 67/PAT/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

253(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the said case.” It is seen that the request for condoning the said delays are similarly worded for the remaining two appeals. Hence, based on the reasons given for AY 2013-14, the delay in filing of the appeals is hereby condoned and these three matters are admitted for adjudication

DCIT(EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, PATNA vs. M/S DEO MANGAL MEMORIAL TRUST, PATNA

In the result, these appeals filed by the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 65/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI DUVVURU RL REDDY, VICE PRESIDENT SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1)Section 2(15)Section 250Section 253(2)

253(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the said case.” It is seen that the request for condoning the said delays are similarly worded for the remaining two appeals. Hence, based on the reasons given for AY 2013-14, the delay in filing of the appeals is hereby condoned and these three matters are admitted for adjudication

MOTOR MACHINERUY TOOLS,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 39/PAT/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz)]

Section 250Section 28Section 43(1)

253/- and after reducing the incentive of Rs. 4.08 lakhs received from M/s. Usha International Ltd. from the cost of acquisition, the balance amount was reflected in the balance sheet on which depreciation was claimed by the assessee. He has contended that this accounting treatment was duly given by the assessee as per Explanation 10 to Section