GRAM NIRMAN MANDAL,NAWADA vs. DC/AC EXEMPTION, CIR, PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

disallowed every claimed exemption of Rs.3,16,98,714 under section 11,12& 10(238). 8) That, as per assessment order u/s 143(3) assessed income is Rs.3,16,98714 /- and Gross tax liability is Rs 30,09,194/- 9) That, delay of filling of 10B was caused due to the negligence of the of the chartered Accountant, assessee should

SHASHI KRISHNA EDUCATIONAL AVAM WELFARE SOCIETY,PATNA vs. AO, PATNA

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

disallowing the exemption u/s 11 as claimed in return. This authority has no jurisdiction to condone the delay in filing Form 10B. 5.3 As regard appellant's appeal against taxing the entire receipts instead of taxing the income over expenditure, it is stated that facts involved in the issue is that the appellant had disclosed gross receipts of Rs.1

RADHA GOVIND PUBLIC WELFARE SOCIETY,RAMGARH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2015-16

1) was issued in the course of assessment proceeding on all the twelve issues which have been raised by the Ld. CIT in the impugned revisionary proceeding. He also submitted that assessee had duly complied with the requirements of the said notice and also produced books of accounts, bills, vouchers in respect of the activities carried out by the assessee