BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Unexplained Moneyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai419Delhi319Chennai110Jaipur100Bangalore89Ahmedabad83Kolkata73Hyderabad67Chandigarh54Pune42Indore36Visakhapatnam33Nagpur23Guwahati20Cochin20Raipur19Lucknow18Surat10Rajkot10Cuttack9Allahabad7Agra7Varanasi7Jodhpur6Amritsar6Patna4SC3Ranchi3ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Karnataka1Telangana1Jabalpur1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Addition to Income3Section 2502Section 69A2Section 1472Section 133(6)2Section 2632Unexplained Money2Depreciation2Limitation/Time-bar2Condonation of Delay

M/S MANISH FINLEASE (P) LTD,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), PATNA

ITA 25/PAT/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2010-2011 Manish Finlease Pvt Ltd., Vs. Ito, Ward 2(1), Patna Chandi House Exhibition Road, Patna Pan/Gir No.Aaccm 6252 B (Appellant) .. ( Respondent) Assessee By : Shri A.K.Rastogi & Rakesh Kumar, Ars Revenue By : Shri Indrajeet Singh, Dr Date Of Hearing : 20/06/ 2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 09/08/ 2019 O R D E R Per Bench This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-1, Patna Dated 27.9.2018 For The Assessment Year 2010-2011. 2. The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Delayed By 51 Days. The Assessee Has Filed Application For Condonation Of Delay Stating The Reasons For Not Filing The Appeal In Time Before The Tribunal. After Hearing The Submissions Of The Parties, We Are Satisfied That The Assessee Had A Bonafide Reason For Not Filing The Appeal In Time. Therefore, We Condone The Delay & Proceed To Decide The Appeal Of The Assessee On Merits.

For Appellant: Shri A.K.Rastogi & Rakesh Kumar, ARsFor Respondent: Shri Indrajeet Singh, DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148(1)Section 68
2

unexplained credit u/s.68 of the I.T.Act, 1961 and made addition into the total income of the assessee. P a g e 6 | 71 Assessment Year : 2010 -2011 5. Feeling aggrieved from the order of AO, the assessee appealed before the ld. CIT(A). In the Form 35, the assessee challenged to the reopening of the case as per the Section

GURUDWARA BAL LEELA MAINI SANGAT TRUST,PATNA vs. DC/AC, EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 299/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna01 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 11Section 115Section 12ASection 250Section 69Section 69A

depreciation in respect of assets which has been claimed as application under the same year or the same is not allowable in terms of Section 11 (6) of the Act notwithstanding the fact that the prescription in the said sub Section is limited to the computation of application of income for charitable purposes to the extent stated

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, PATNA, PATNA vs. SUMAN KUMAR, GAYA

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 174/PAT/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice- & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No.174/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2020-21 Acit, Central Circle-1, Patna…..…………………...........................……….……Appellant Vs. Suman Kumar……….…………....……...…………………………………....…..Respondent S/O Late Madan Singh, Vill-Baijnathpur, P.O-Wazir Gangj, Distt- Gaya (Bihar)-805131. [Pan: Arxpk3461F]

Section 132(1)Section 250Section 69A

money without appreciating the fact that the assessee did not furnish any corroborative documents which could establish that intercepted cash amount being brought from Lucknow by flight was recorded in his books of accounts. ii. That on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (A)-3, Patna has erred both

SRIRAM ENTERPRISES,PATNA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 76/PAT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. No. 76/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 Sriram Enterprises,………………………..........Appellant C/O. Nirmal & Associates, Nepali Kothi, Opposite Gasoline Petrol Pump, Boring Road, Patna-800001 [Pan:Aarfs8853J] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna,…………………………………..……………..Respondent, Bihar-800001 Appearances By: Shri Nishant Maitin, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : 5Th March, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: May 8Th, 2024 O R D E R

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 263

unexplained money u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act,1961. In this connection, question 9 of statement on oath recorded of Shri Roshan Kumar Agarwal partner of M/s Sri Ram Enterprises on 27.03.2018 after issuing of summon u/s 131(1) and its reply is appended below:- 18. In reply to question no. 13 of statement on oath of Sri Roshan