BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “depreciation”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi471Mumbai426Bangalore213Chennai120Jaipur120Kolkata106Ahmedabad68Amritsar42Hyderabad39Chandigarh39Pune32Indore29Raipur24Cochin21Karnataka19Guwahati18Nagpur15Lucknow14Cuttack11Allahabad8SC8Patna7Surat7Varanasi5Telangana4Ranchi4Jodhpur4Rajkot4Agra2Jabalpur2Punjab & Haryana1Panaji1Kerala1Dehradun1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Addition to Income6Disallowance4Section 143(2)3Section 2502Section 142(1)2Section 2632Section 282

ASHOK KUMAR,BHOJPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1, ARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as indicated above

ITA 259/PAT/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Apr 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 40

undisclosed income on unrecorded purchases. Both the authorities have made analysis of the 10 Assessment Year: 2010-2011 Ashok Kumar material found during the course of survey. The assessee failed to submit any material to rebut the conclusions of facts arrived at by the revenue authorities below. Therefore, we do not find any merit in this ground of appeal

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, PATNA, PATNA vs. SUMAN KUMAR, GAYA

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 174/PAT/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Patna10 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice- & Shri Sanjay Awasthii.T.A. No.174/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2020-21 Acit, Central Circle-1, Patna…..…………………...........................……….……Appellant Vs. Suman Kumar……….…………....……...…………………………………....…..Respondent S/O Late Madan Singh, Vill-Baijnathpur, P.O-Wazir Gangj, Distt- Gaya (Bihar)-805131. [Pan: Arxpk3461F]

Section 132(1)Section 250Section 69A

undisclosed income from sand mining, could not be submitted in a I.T.A. No.174/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2020-21 Suman Kumar revised return due to some technical issue. However, the Assessing Officer added this amount u/s 69A of the Act. 1.1 Before the ld. CIT(A), the assessee could succeed on most issues, except on the addition of Rs.30,00,000/-. Briefly

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, PATNA, PATNA vs. NORTH BIHAR POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and COs of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 234/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vp & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am

For Appellant: Sh. Ankit Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Md. A. H. Chowdhary, CIT (DR)

income of the assessee which is in para 5.1 as read as under: “5.1 Ground no. 6: In this ground, the appellant has contested the addition of Rs. 28,78,62,239/- on account of undisclosed interest on state funded 9 ITA No.99/Pat./2025 and CO No.04/Pat/25 ITA No.140/Pat/2025 and CO.No.05/ Pat/2025 ITA No.234/Pat/2025 and CO.No.08/Pat/ 2025 scheme

JOINT COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX(IN-SITU), CIRCLE-1, PATNA, PATNA vs. NORTH BIHAR POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and COs of the\nassessee are dismissed

ITA 99/PAT/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

income of the\nassessee which is in para 5.1 as read under:\n\"5.1\nGround no. 6: In this ground, the appellant has contested the\naddition of Rs. 28,78,62,239/- on account of undisclosed interest on state funded\nscheme. The issue is discussed on page 3 of the assessment order by the AO. The\nfunds received for BRGF

JCIT(IN-SITU), CIRCLE-1, PATNA., PATNA vs. NORTH BIHAR POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, PATNA

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and COs of the\nassessee are dismissed

ITA 140/PAT/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Feb 2026AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Sh. Ankit Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Md. A. H. Chowdhary, CIT (DR)

income of the\nassessee which is in para 5.1 as read under:\n\"5.1\nGround no. 6: In this ground, the appellant has contested the\naddition of Rs. 28,78,62,239/- on account of undisclosed interest on state funded\nscheme. The issue is discussed on page 3 of the assessment order by the AO. The\nfunds received for BRGF

SRIRAM ENTERPRISES,PATNA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 76/PAT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. No. 76/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 Sriram Enterprises,………………………..........Appellant C/O. Nirmal & Associates, Nepali Kothi, Opposite Gasoline Petrol Pump, Boring Road, Patna-800001 [Pan:Aarfs8853J] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna,…………………………………..……………..Respondent, Bihar-800001 Appearances By: Shri Nishant Maitin, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : 5Th March, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: May 8Th, 2024 O R D E R

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 263

undisclosed investment as it is not disclosed in your balance sheet. 24 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 Sriram Enterprises 3. The building was valued by the Registered Valuer at Rs. 2.71 crores, please furnish its valuation as per books of account and explain the difference, if any. 17. During course of survey cash amounting Rs. 16,76,500/- was found. Since

ACIT, CIRCLE-4, PATNA vs. SH. SURESH , PATNA

ITA 205/PAT/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna27 Jun 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Alok Kumar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Rinku Singh, CIT D/R
Section 250Section 28Section 54Section 54F

depreciated on account of going various litigations. It is submitted that the circle municipal value shown in the sale deed is merely for the limited purpose calculation of stamp duty by the state government. The assessee was engaged in legal dispute over the title of the immovable property in question. Due to dispute attached to the property the assessee