BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

16 results for “depreciation”+ Set Off of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,627Delhi2,763Chennai1,202Bangalore1,198Kolkata723Ahmedabad490Hyderabad284Jaipur264Pune216Karnataka203Chandigarh162Raipur160Surat136Indore108Cuttack87Visakhapatnam81Cochin65SC60Amritsar58Lucknow57Rajkot49Ranchi46Nagpur39Telangana36Jodhpur31Guwahati31Allahabad17Patna16Kerala16Dehradun15Panaji13Agra10Calcutta10Jabalpur7Varanasi7Punjab & Haryana4Orissa4Rajasthan2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Gauhati1Tripura1Himachal Pradesh1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)17Section 80I14Section 14711Section 26311Section 143(2)8Section 44A8Addition to Income8Section 2507Depreciation7Section 144

VIKRAMSHILA DUGDH UTPADAK SAHKARI SANGH LTD,BHAGALPUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BHAGALPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 59/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 119(2)(b)Section 154Section 250Section 32

depreciation was not considered and allowed to be set of. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) in a detailed order allowed the claim of carry forward and set of business loss

ADITYA FUTURISTIC TRADING PVT. LTD.,PATNA vs. CIT-I, PATNA, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

5
Penalty3
Disallowance3
ITA 184/PAT/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed
ITAT Patna
22 Dec 2022
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Ble & Shri Girish Agrawal, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. Aditya Futuristic Trading Cit-1, Patna Pvt. Ltd. C/O. Nirmal & Associates, Chartered Accountants, Nepali Vs. Kothi, Opp. Gasoline Petrol Pump. Boring Road, Patna – 800001. [Pan: Aaeca 9085 E] (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Shri Nishant Maitin, Ca Revenue By : Smt. Rinku Singh, Cit/Dr Date Of Hearing : 13.12.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.12.2022 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Pcit-1, Patna Dated 23.03.2018 U/S 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’). The Assessee Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “I. For That The Grounds Hereto Are Without Prejudice To Each Other. Ii. For That The Order Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1, Patna Is Bad Both In Law & On Facts. Iii. For That The Order Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1, Patna Is Based On Presumption, Surmise & Conjectures. Iv. For That The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-1, Patna Passed The Order Ignoring The Fact That All The Points Which Were Raised In The Notice Had Duly Been Examined By The Ld. Ao.

For Appellant: Shri Nishant Maitin, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Rinku Singh, CIT/DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

depreciation chart and to determine the issue of deductibility of the same against the Gross Revenue Receipt (GRP). The failure of the Assessing Officer to conduct necessary enquiry and investigation to determine the nature of loss on capital assets 4 M/s. Aditya Futuristic Trading Pvt. Ltd. A.Y. 2013-14 as well as the amount being deductible against Gross Receipt

ACIT, CIRCLE-1, PATNA vs. BIHAR KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANK, MUNGER

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 257/PAT/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 Dec 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(viia)

depreciation claimed by the assessee for reducing the bills were not supplied and total disallowance of Rs. 2,76,084/- was made and the same was added back to the income of the assessee before set off of losses

THE MUZAFFARPUR CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,MUZAFFARPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 87/PAT/2019[12/03/2019]Status: HeardITAT Patna05 Jul 2022

Bench: Shri Mainsh Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 139Section 139(3)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 32(2)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 72

loss incurred during the regular course of banking business and as such should have been allowed to be set off against current year’s income. 13. For that in any view, depreciation

ACIT vs. INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WELFARE HUMAN RESOURCES,

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed while the Cross Objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 119/PAT/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Oct 2024AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishra

For Appellant: Shri Abhi Sarkar, AdvFor Respondent: Ld. DR. Lalita Kumari, Sr. DR
Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250

loss or depreciation allowance or any other allowance under this Act has been computed.] 6.1 The Second Proviso relied upon by the Ld. CIT(A) has been inserted by the Finance Act, 2008, w.e.f. 1.4.2008. As the second reopening was done on 02.04.2009, being a procedural provision, the same was available on the statute but it has to be examined

PUNRASAR JUTE PARK LIMITED,PURNEA vs. CIT, PURNEA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 432/PAT/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna05 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 142(2)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

loss or the depreciation allowance or any other allowance, as the case may be, for the assessment year concerned (hereafter in this section and in sections 148 to 153 referred to as the relevant assessment year): Provided that where an assessment under sub-section (3) of section 143 or this section has been made for the relevant assessment year

SRIRAM ENTERPRISES,PATNA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 76/PAT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna08 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. No. 76/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 Sriram Enterprises,………………………..........Appellant C/O. Nirmal & Associates, Nepali Kothi, Opposite Gasoline Petrol Pump, Boring Road, Patna-800001 [Pan:Aarfs8853J] -Vs.- Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna,…………………………………..……………..Respondent, Bihar-800001 Appearances By: Shri Nishant Maitin, C.A., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Cit (D.R.), Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing : 5Th March, 2024 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: May 8Th, 2024 O R D E R

Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 263

loss set-off/adjusted, advance tax paid, self-assessment tax paid, TDS deducted, total tax paid, refund claimed for the current year under consideration and previous two years. Provide the comparison of sales/turnover, gross profit, net profit, GP 6. ratio, NP ratio for the year under consideration and previous two years. Provide the justification of large refund claimed

RELIABLE SERVICES PVT LTD,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-1, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 25/PAT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz)& Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 263

loss account, relevant Form 26AS etc. corroborating the said facts. The assessee submitted that the income was shown in the earlier years on the basis of accrual basis 3 AY: 2017-18 Reliable Service Pvt. Ltd. pursuant to mercantile system of accounting as Rs. 7,66,485/- was offered

M/S KUMAR CONSTRUCTION,CHAPRA vs. DCIT, CICLE-2, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 200/PAT/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 Sept 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Bleita Nos.200/Pat/2014 Assessment Year: 2005-06 M/S. Kumar Construction Dcit, Circle-2, Muzaffarpur P.O. Dumri Adda, P.S. Vs. Doriganj, Dist. Chapra. Pan: Aajfm 7295 G (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Smt. Archana Sharma, Ca Respondent By : Shri Rupesh Agrawal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 28.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.09.2022 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma, Jm: The Captioned Appeals Preferred By The Assessee For The A.Y. 2005-06 Is Directed Against The Order Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 Passed By Osd, Cit(A) Dated 26.06.2014. The Assessee Has Taken The Following Revised Ground Of Appeal For A.Y. 2005-06 As Under: “I. The Ld. Assessing Officer Has Assessed Profit @ 8% Of Total Gross Receipts Amount To Rs. 2,40,85,620/- Amounting To Rs. 19,26,850/- & Added Back To Assessee’S Income While Computation Of Tax. Ii. Capital Introduced By 6 Partner’S Amounting To Rs. 12,20,000/- Has Been Outrightly Rejected By Ao & Added Back To Assessees Income While Computation Of Tax. Iii. The Respondent Have Rejected The Books Of Accounts Invoking The Provision Of Section 145(3) & Rejecting The Books Of Accounts Regularly Maintained & Holding That The Audited Books Of Accounts Were Not Absolutely Reliable. So, We Pray For Consider The Revised Grounds Stated Above & Grant Relief For Assessee’S Income @ 6% Of The Total Receipts Of Rs. 2,40,85,620/-.”

For Appellant: Smt. Archana Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rupesh Agrawal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)

depreciation claimed in the profit and loss accounts. However, doing so, he allowed salary and interest to partners amounting to Rs. 3,97,897/- therefrom. Since the assessee firm was reconstituted and seven partners had introduced Rs. 17,86,586/- towards their capital and out of seven partners did not file any documentary proof to explain the source of capital

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, MUZAFFARPUR vs. M/S R.P.RAI ESTATE PVT LTD, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 28/PAT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna03 Apr 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2017-18 Dcit, Circle-1, Muzaffarpur M/S. R.P. Rai Estate Pvt. Ltd. Vs 19, Goharua, Patliputra Colony, Patliputra, Patna- 800013. Pan: Aaccr 4972 P (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra, Jcit, Dr Respondent By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate Date Of Hearing : 19.03.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 03.04.2024 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma, Jm: This Appeal Of The Revenue For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 29.06.2020 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeal), Patna [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Ld. Cit(A)’].

For Appellant: Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra, JCIT, DRFor Respondent: Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocate
Section 143(2)

loss account under the head of business receipt. However, submission of the assessee was not accepted by the AO. Accordingly, the ld. AO made an addition of Rs. 1,83,58,108/- as income from house property. Further, estimated the income of the assessee applying net profit of 8% on the gross contract receipts

RAKESH KUMAR,PATNA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2012-13

ITA 86/PAT/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. Nos.85 & 86/Pat/2017 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80I

setting certificate indicating the location and address of industrial undertaking and Small Scale Industries certificate issued by GM, DIC, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Ld. AO, however, was not satisfied with the claim of deduction u/s. 80IC of the Act on account of various reasons which included that assessee is merely assembling the goods and not carrying out any manufacturing activity of making

RAKESH KUMAR,PATNA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4, PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2012-13

ITA 85/PAT/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. Nos.85 & 86/Pat/2017 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80I

setting certificate indicating the location and address of industrial undertaking and Small Scale Industries certificate issued by GM, DIC, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Ld. AO, however, was not satisfied with the claim of deduction u/s. 80IC of the Act on account of various reasons which included that assessee is merely assembling the goods and not carrying out any manufacturing activity of making

I.T.O. vs. M/S KUMAR CONSTRUCLTION,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 10/PAT/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 40A(3)

Loss Account under Direct Expenses Head and TDS has not been deducted on aforementioned amount. ” 15. As per Sec. 40(a)(ia), if any rent is liable for tax deduction u/s 1941 and tax has not been deducted, the expense is not allowable. Therefore, Rs. 1,43,10,424/- is disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) and added back

M/S NORTH BIHAR DISTRIBUTOR,PURNEA vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), PURNEA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 68/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna22 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Jha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rupesh Agrawal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 271BSection 44A

setting forth such particulars as may be prescribed : Provided that this section shall not apply to the person, who derives income of the nature referred to in section 44B or section 44BBA, on and from the 1st day of April, 1985 or, as the case may be, the date on which the relevant section came into force, whichever is later

M/S NORTH BIHAR DISTRIBUTOR,PURNEA vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), PURNEA

In the result, appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 48/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna22 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Jha, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rupesh Agrawal, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 271BSection 44A

setting forth such particulars as may be prescribed : Provided that this section shall not apply to the person, who derives income of the nature referred to in section 44B or section 44BBA, on and from the 1st day of April, 1985 or, as the case may be, the date on which the relevant section came into force, whichever is later

MOTOR MACHINERUY TOOLS,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 39/PAT/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz)]

Section 250Section 28Section 43(1)

set, agricultural engines, power tiller, lubricants, spare parts etc. It works as dealer/redistributor of companies like M/s. Cotton Grieves and M/s. Usha International Ltd. The return of income for the year under consideration was filed by it on 29.09.2011 declaring total income at Rs.11,88,753/-. The said return was selected for scrutiny through CASS. It was noticed